[mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?

Fri Dec 11 14:54:17 GMT 2015

Hi Carlos,

it depends on the style rules. The default style seems
to avoid routing over highway=* with area=yes. 
I think the reason was that many ways tagged with area=yes
are not suitable for routing, they would produce havy zig-zagging lines.
A possible solution would be a new algo that collects the ways
within such an area and the highway connected to it and then decides
how to connect the ways without crossing any obstacles or leaving the area. 
This is not simple, but AFAIK there is a general solution for the problem. I don't plan 
to code it, maybe someone else has the time and energy...

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam at orangecorreo.es>
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 15:14
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?

Are all highway=* & area=yes really ignored for routing? There are
plenty of cases of highway=residential & area=yes and I think they
should be routable.
I know way 109862652 should have a name tag (Plaza de los Bermejales as
well) but if a way with the same name than addr:street already exists,
shouldn't it be used for address search?

El 11/12/15 a las 09:41, Gerd Petermann escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I think the problem is that the way
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110145380
> is tagged with area=yes and therefore it is ignored for routing,
> means, it is not added as a road.
> Besides that highway=residential  way
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109862652
> is not tagged with name=*.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <cdavilam at orangecorreo.es>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 20:09
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] No address match for highway=pedestrian?
>
> I have found several cases where mkgmap complains no road is found for a
> given address but there's a pedestrian highway with the correct name
> next to the address nodes/ways. See for example:
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2534468261
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 3(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246230812
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 6(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232406
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 7(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246232873
> 5114002.o5m: found no plausible road for address Plaza de los Bermejales
> 9(0) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246233710
> and way 110145380

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev