[mkgmap-dev] patch to write polygons in decreasing order
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Nov 8 06:48:21 GMT 2016
Hi Ticker, okay, I will try on my own later. Please review the patch: 1) log messages esp. those with log.warn. I think most are debug messages ? This one looks wrong to me: ""Area single pixel shifted so can't split at ".... What does it mean? 2) Comments / javadoc : Please remove commented code and add javadoc without jokes like @return An area containing xsplit*ysplit areas (hopefully). Instead try to explain in what case the result will be null. BTW: It seems that this change in the code no longer depends on the new option. Is that intended? Gerd Ticker Berkin wrote > Hi Gerd > > I've been looking at ShapeSplitter and clipping to a rectangle > algorithms generally. I don't feel I know enough about how to use the > java.awt.geom package to implement this effectively, and so I'd rather > keep to using Java2DConverter and .intersect(), even though it is most > likely much less efficient. > > Ticker > > On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 23:33 -0700, Gerd Petermann wrote: >> Hi Ticker, >> >> Gerd Petermann wrote >> > Alternative would be to implement a clipper which doesn't need >> > area.intersect(). I've once coded the "Sutherland-Hodgman >> > algorithm" but >> > ways or concave shapes producing spikes, but I still think this >> > would be a >> > great improvement. See attached (out-aged) patch and the wiki >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutherland%E2%80%93Hodgman_algorithm >> > for further details. >> >> I just noticed that the algo is already used in >> ShapeSplitter.clipSinglePathWithSutherlandHodgman(), >> the comment says >> "Clip a single path with a given rectangle using the Sutherland >> -Hodgman >> algorithm. This is much faster compared to the area.intersect method, >> but >> may create dangling edges." >> I think these danling edges are now removed in the >> RemoveObsoletePointsFilter, so maybe it is worth >> trying. >> >> Gerd >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/patch-to >> -write-polygons-in-decreasing-order-tp5884038p5885439.html >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > mkgmap-dev at .org >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/patch-to-write-polygons-in-decreasing-order-tp5884038p5885541.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] patch to write polygons in decreasing order
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] patch to write polygons in decreasing order
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list