[mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:drawLevel and --order-by-decreasing-area
From rheinskipper1000 at gmx.de rheinskipper1000 at gmx.de on Wed Nov 16 21:08:38 GMT 2016
Meanwhile I repaired the “Bad Godesberg” fairway polygon (in osm data) and now can confirm that draw order works perfectly for fairway on river polygons. After that I tested intertidal zones on top of sea polygons. Everything works perfect. It is amazing: https://mega.nz/#!oJ1WmLKT!AbxYucPbfP79F1Rv_5B5btUK3KkkWktBnqtyfTZIBV8 I tried to achieve this for about 5 years, but had no chance. And now it works. Many thanks to Ticker for making this possible. And sorry for mixing up threads. It´s because I´m so excited about the new feature! Von: rheinskipper1000 at gmx.de Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. November 2016 18:45 An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:drawLevel and --order-by-decreasing-area My first test look really promising. All the draw order problems for fairway on river Rhine in the Mainz/Wiesbaden area are gone. It looks very beautiful now: https://mega.nz/#!dFE1QIKK!BfIobp0WApKJtGdthwWvDt8IzNluZSwOaixW7PnmvJk However I still found one spot where the fairway is still not visible: https://mega.nz/#!IM1FjK6R!Q0pDo43Qu8alan4Qrk4QCGsQtTyoQg7eWQx5cLs_EU8 But this should not be a mkgmap issue because same problem also exists in openseamap online map. I will investigate further and keep you informed. Thank you so much for this great improvement. It is a huge step for the openseamap project because it is pre-condition for rendering crowdsourced water depth as different shades of blue. There are 7 different predefined extended types for water depth which all have same built in draw order. Now chances are good that they can be controlled. And sorry for mixing LEVEL and RESOLUTION. I used LEVEL but my style is based on default style which uses RESOLUTION. Ups, thread was still wrong. Von: Ticker Berkin Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. November 2016 17:05 An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Spurious points & Basecamp blank tiles Hi Not quite, you should have something like: seamark:type=fairway {name 'fairway'; set mkgmap:drawLevel=60 } [0x10306 level 2] waterway=riverbank { set mkgmap:drawLevel=02 } [0x10302 resolution 18] but you only need one of the mkgmap:drawLevel for the fairway to be written after/overwrite the riverbank. Which you use depends on what you want the behaviour to be with other polygons sharing the same area. Also, slightly confusing to have level and resolution in the same style. And the wrong thread. Regards Ticker _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20161116/55bfdd77/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:drawLevel and --order-by-decreasing-area
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:drawLevel and --order-by-decreasing-area
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list