[mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
From Gerd Petermann GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Jan 30 11:10:15 GMT 2017
I did not try if the rule itself works. If it catches "bad", "very_bad", and all worser values I think it is good as it is. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von lig fietser <ligfietser at hotmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Januar 2017 10:07:07 An: mkgmap-dev Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved? Hi list, On the Garmin OSM forum there is a discussion started whether we should consider smoothness=bad as unpaved. In the default rules it is treated as unpaved. What do you think? Should we adapt the rules and skip 'bad' from the unpaved list? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628555#p628555
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list