[mkgmap-dev] construction as industry?
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Feb 6 08:38:22 GMT 2017
Hi Nick, type 0x0c is used for very different things. A quick grep 0x0c -r * shows these polygon rules: inc/landuse_polygons:landuse=commercial [0x0c resolution 19] inc/landuse_polygons:landuse=construction [0x0c resolution 21] inc/landuse_polygons:landuse=quarry [0x0c resolution 19] inc/landuse_polygons:landuse=industrial [0x0c resolution 23-19] This looks in fact a bit strange to me. @Style experts: Please suggest other types. Gerd nwillink wrote > Hi > > I just realised that in the default polygon style construction, whether > its residential or industrial , is always defined as industrial 0x0c. > > I understand the' logic' , in that there are many 'mobile' industries > constructing residential or industrial buildings. > > In my city there are numerous large construction sites, all of them > constructing residential housing. > If I were unknown to the city and plan a route through an industrial area > I would expect to find the following : > > a) industrial blocks / units / working businesses > b) roads entering and crossing industrial areas safe from > barriers,fencing,cones,mud-sweepers,grumpiness or foremen etc > > Personally I would provide a separate polygon , ie 0x27 perhaps > > Just a thought. > > Nick -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/construction-as-industry-tp5890573p5890635.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] construction as industry?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] construction as industry?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list