[mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Feb 6 08:45:36 GMT 2017
Hi, if I got that right the forum agreed to this, so if nobody complains I'll change the default style as suggested on thursday. Gerd ligfietser wrote > The problem is that it works too well. Paved roads with some potholes > which are marked as bad are avoided. > > On the forum there is support for skipping smoothness=bad from the list of > unpaved options, but to add a road_speed penalty instead. > > > I think of adding this rule after the unpaved rules > > highway=* & mkgmap:unpaved=0 & smoothness ~ '.*(bad|horrible|impassable)' > { add mkgmap:road-speed = '-2' } > > > > > > ________________________________ > Van: mkgmap-dev < > mkgmap-dev-bounces at .org > > namens Gerd Petermann < > GPetermann_muenchen@ > > > Verzonden: maandag 30 januari 2017 03:10:15 > Aan: Development list for mkgmap > Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved? > > I did not try if the rule itself works. If it catches "bad", "very_bad", > and all worser values I think it is good as it is. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev < > mkgmap-dev-bounces at .org > > im Auftrag von lig fietser < > ligfietser@ > > > Gesendet: Montag, 30. Januar 2017 10:07:07 > An: mkgmap-dev > Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved? > > Hi list, > > On the Garmin OSM forum there is a discussion started whether we should > consider smoothness=bad as unpaved. In the default rules it is treated as > unpaved. What do you think? > > Should we adapt the rules and skip 'bad' from the unpaved list? > > https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628555#p628555 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Is-smoothness-bad-unpaved-tp5890167p5890637.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list