[mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Wed Feb 8 10:42:09 GMT 2017
Hi Patrik > Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli. I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem. If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin converter does that gmapi map work? The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does not work. So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be a difference between the two maps. The only differences I know of are: 1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory. 2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file. Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of. If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix. I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know.. If there is another difference I need to know what it is. If you could create a small map that does not work that you could upload that would be helpful. ..Steve > It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the > overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...), > in no case I have overview maps. > The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory > structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names. > > Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options... > > Cheers > Patrik > > On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote: >> Hi Patrik >> >>> I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work >>> properly regarding overview maps: >>> - I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are >>> properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file, >>> elsewhere ?) >>> - running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below) >>> causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp >> >> How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or >> Garmin's conversion tool? >> >> >>> BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now >>> overview maps visible on the GPS itself. >> >> The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually >> included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should >> not do that. >> >> ..Steve >>> Here the call of mkgmap and its output: >>> >>> java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar >>> D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar >>> --max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi >>> --license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1 >>> --family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" >>> --series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX >>> (Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP >>> --tdbfile --show-profiles=1 >>> Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017 >>> Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0 >>> Number of ExitExceptions: 0 >>> Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017 >>> Total time taken: 1858ms >>> >>> Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly >>> implemented gmapi option ? >>> >>> Thanks for helping >>> Patrik >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Problems with -- gmapi (and possibly --gmapsupp also)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list