[mkgmap-dev] RE Commit r3801: merge split-shape branch
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Wed Feb 15 16:14:21 GMT 2017
Hi Gerd / Mike I've just committed a fix for this to the split-shape branch Ticker On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 08:53 +0000, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi Mike > > OK - I think I understand the problem. > > Can you try with --order-by-decreasing-area and let me know if that > stops the unbound recursion, and, in the meantime, I'll work on it. > > Thanks > Ticker > > > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 00:48 +0000, Mike Baggaley wrote: > > HI Ticker, having run this under the debugger now, it appears that > > it > > is not the postcode data after all - I was getting confused between > > the too small to split messages and too many POIs messages. I was > > previously getting too small to split messages in splitter, but not > > in mkgmap. > > > > I temporarily changed the code to: > > > > } else if (mustSplit) { // can't reduce > > size, so force more subdivisions > > if (depth < 1000) { > > log.debug("splitting > > area by contents", area); > > MapArea[] sublist = > > area.split(1, 1, bounds, true); > > addAreasToList(sublist, > > alist, depth + 1); > > continue; > > } else { > > log.error("Area too > > small to split at " + area.getBounds().getCenter().toOSMURL() + " > > (reduce the density of points, length of lines, etc.)"); > > > > } > > } > > > > This ran successfully and gave a single error: > > Area too small to split at > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.797190&mlon=0.918646&zoom=17 > > (r > > educe the density of points, length of lines, etc. > > > > Stopping in the debugger, I can see that sizes[MapArea.SHAPE_KIND] > > is > > 68076 and from the coordinate it is processing the coastline. The > > call stack has the same value for the sizes[MapArea.SHAPE_KIND] in > > every instance of addAreasToList, so it looks like the call to > > area.split is not actually splitting. Looking at the resulting file > > in BaseCamp, I can see that the coastline is corrupt. > > > > Hope that helps, > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ticker Berkin [mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk] > > Sent: 14 February 2017 23:21 > > To: Mike Baggaley <mike at tvage.co.uk> > > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] RE Commit r3801: merge split-shape branch > > > > Hi Mike > > > > I have the raw postcode data (codePointOpen.zip) which I processes > > just > > to take the first few at the same point but I can change it do all > > of > > them individually. Do you feed it with a map through the splitter > > or > > just make a postcode only overlay? What is the bit of style you use > > to > > represent each postcode? I can probably knock up something similar. > > > > The code should cope - I can't see anything obviously wrong so need > > to > > try and reproduce the problem > > > > Ticker > > > > On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 18:17 +0000, Mike Baggaley wrote: > > > Hi Ticker the data is postcode centres (points). As well as > > > geographic postcodes, the Royal Mail postcode data includes a > > > number > > > of postcodes that are centred on sorting offices (presumably for > > > box > > > numbers). There are quite a few at large sorting offices, but if > > > each > > > split should be able to accept 255 points, and it is exceeding > > > 2000 > > > splits before crashing, it looks like the splitting is not > > > working > > > - > > > there won't be more than 2000 * 255 postcodes at the same place. > > > My > > > OSM file is rather large. I can see whether I can extract a map > > > centred on a sorting office. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mike > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ticker Berkin [mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk] > > > Sent: 14 February 2017 17:52 > > > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] RE Commit r3801: merge split-shape > > > branch > > > > > > Hi Mike > > > > > > This is an area of code I've changed and it should be able to > > > cope > > > with > > > many items at the same location without recursing. > > > > > > Do you have some sample data? what are the items > > > (point/line/shape > > > extended?) > > > > > > Ticker > > > > > > On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 17:40 +0000, Mike Baggaley wrote: > > > > Hi Gerd, since this change I am getting a > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError crash > > > > caused by the code recursively attempting to split something > > > > which > > > > is > > > > unsplittable (assuming the split is based on location), as I > > > > have > > > > a > > > > large > > > > number of points at exactly the same location (from external > > > > data > > > > I > > > > add to > > > > the OSM data). > > > > > > > > The offending line is at > > > > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapSplitter.addAreasToList(MapSplit > > > > te > > > > r. > > > > ja > > > > va:187) > > > > . It is failing on my system with a depth of 2342. I suggest > > > > there > > > > needs to > > > > be a maximum depth after which it should give up trying to > > > > split. > > > > > > > > } else if (mustSplit) { // > > > > can't reduce > > > > size, so force more subdivisions > > > > log.debug("splitting > > > > area by > > > > contents", area); > > > > MapArea[] sublist = > > > > area.split(1, 1, > > > > bounds, true); > > > > addAreasToList(sublist, > > > > alist, > > > > depth > > > > + 1); > > > > continue; > > > > } > > > > > > > > I am unsure whether you would want a fixed depth limit, would > > > > want > > > > it > > > > to be > > > > set by parameter, would prefer to catch the error or think it > > > > would > > > > be > > > > possible to see whether the proposed area split has made any > > > > improvement, > > > > and give up if it hasn't. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] RE Commit r3801: merge split-shape branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] RE Commit r3801: merge split-shape branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list