[mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
From Gerd Petermann GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Mar 7 17:24:41 GMT 2017
Hi Ticker, hmm, the messages are produced because I abuse the Boundary classes for the ResidentialHook. It should say landuse=residential instead of admin_level=11. I'll see if I can fix that. Anyway, the data in that area is probably wrong as landuse areas should not overlap. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. März 2017 18:10:49 An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential Hi Gerd For an unrelated reason, I was just comparing logs of a run with trunk (r-3834) with my version which contains up to r-3831 and mix of some of your patches and my changes and, for trunk, for I get 140 or so lines like: WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree 74220042.osm.pbf: incorrect data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.795731&mlon=1.157684&zoom=17&way= 258759285 intersection of boundaries with same admin_level (11) w258759285 w75394535 WARN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.boundary.BoundaryQuadTree 74220042.osm.pbf: incorrect data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.849289&mlon=1.089020&zoom=17&way= 199897090 intersection of boundaries with same admin_level (11) w199897090 w60808537 Command was: java -ea -Dlog.config=../mkgmap_log.props -jar ../mkgmap.trunk/mkgmap.jar --generate-sea=multipolygon --input -file=74220042.osm.pbf Not a problem for me, but can provide more info if required Regards Ticker On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 16:59 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > I'd also like to know if it you have an idea how to improve the > usability in case that it doesn't work ;-) > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von nwillink <osm at pinns.co.uk> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 12:53:04 > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential > > Hi Gerd > > Thanks for the suggestion - will let you know when successful > > > r > > > Nick > > On 05/03/2017 11:43, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: > Hi Nick, > > maybe you can check mkgmap:admin_level9..11 to decide if an element > is in a village? > > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=0>> im Auftrag > von nwillink <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=1>> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:46:56 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=2> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential > > Ok Gerd > > I didn't realise that , no wonder I'm having problems > > Thanks for looking into that. > > On 05/03/2017 10:44, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: > Nick, sorry, I don't get it. > > With the patch the value in the new tag mkgmap:residential is > evaluated before any style rule is used. > I see no way for you to pass the information from a node or way with > place=village to another element with building=* > > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=0>> im Auftrag > von nwillink <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=1>> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:32:14 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=2> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential > > Gerd, that is a good point > > It was just a thought that since points are parsed first one could > perhaps set a flag when place=village is true > > then > > mkgmap:residiential=* & village=true . --> show buildings > > > So I was not thinking of mkgmap specifically > > On 05/03/2017 10:08, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: > Please explain what you meant with > "Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in > villages/hamlets..." > > Would that be code in mkgmap or in your style? > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=0>> im Auftrag > von nwillink <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=1>> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 11:03:56 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=2> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential > > Ok Thanks > > On 05/03/2017 09:34, Gerd Petermann [via GIS] wrote: > Hi Nick, > > hmm, not sure what you want to point out. > The tag mkgmap:residential may be set to other values than "yes", > e.g. > ways located in > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454954092 > should have mkgmap:residential=Bahnhofsviertel > > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=0>> im Auftrag > von nwillink <[hidden > email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=1>> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. März 2017 10:27:03 > An: [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=2> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential > > Thanks Gerd > > Works a treat although in my style I had to use > > building=* & mkgmap:residential=yes {delete building} > > in both polygons and lines (outlines). > > Your efforts provide an addiitional bonus in that you may just want > to show > just the faint outlines of buildings. > > Perhaps with some coding you could make exceptions for buildings in > villages/hamlets... > > Nick > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1 > -nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892424.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=3> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892425&i=4> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside > ntial-tp5892342p5892425.html > To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, > click here. > NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma > cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam > espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace > -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber > s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia > l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892426.html> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892427&i=3> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside > ntial-tp5892342p5892427.html > To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, > click here. > NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma > cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam > espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace > -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber > s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia > l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892429.html> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892430&i=3> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside > ntial-tp5892342p5892430.html > To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, > click here. > NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma > cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam > espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace > -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber > s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia > l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892431.html> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5892434&i=3> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > ________________________________ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-special-tag-mkgmap-reside > ntial-tp5892342p5892434.html > To unsubscribe from [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential, > click here. > NAML<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=ma > cro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.nam > espaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace > -nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscriber > s%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > -send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > ________________________________ > View this message in context: Re: [Patch v1] nwe special tag > mkgmap:residential<http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Patch-v1-nwe-specia > l-tag-mkgmap-residential-tp5892342p5892437.html> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive< > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at > Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [Patch v1] nwe special tag mkgmap:residential
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r3832: residential-hook-v1.patch: set mkgmap:residential tag for elements which are in a landuse=residential area.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list