[mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ?
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Tue Mar 28 11:40:40 BST 2017
Hi On my device: find > "All POI" (or any of the more specific finds) only show certain types - 0x12, 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x29 - 0x30, 0x64 - 0x66. If the POI doesn't have a name, it shows as "Unnamed xxx" where xxx seems to be supplied by the garmin device depending on the type/subtype The default style has the following: barrier=bollard | barrier=bus_trap | barrier=gate [0x660f resolution 24] barrier=block | barrier=cycle_barrier | barrier=stile | barrier=kissing_gate [0x660f resolution 24] 0x660f on my device is "Land Feature"/"Pillar" So, when out walking and I want to see what is nearby, doing a find>"All POI" can yield a long list of "Unnamed Pillar" because of all the nearby gates and stiles. I never want to search for a barrier, but would like to see them on the map, so using a POI type that doesn't show on find> and setting the name of the POI to the type of barrier solves this. Likewise, I like to see linear barriers, so in my style/lines I have: barrier=wall | barrier=fence | barrier=hedge | barrier=ditch {add name='${barrier|subst:"_=> "}'} [0x2a resolution 24] #RWB is just an marker I use so I can tell which are my changes from the default style when I want to merge in release changes. It occurred to me later: is there a set of POI types that are never searchable on any device. If so, can they be omitted from the POI index, so saving mkgmap index processing memory and IMG size Ticker On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 05:26 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > can you explain this a bit, please? > I don't understand what RW8 means, but it seems that you have many > named barriers in your area? > > Gerd > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Montag, 27. März 2017 14:59:26 > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ? > > I have this in my style - as a change from default style- works > nicely: > > #RWB barrier=bollard | barrier=bus_trap | barrier=gate [0x660f > resolution 24] > #RWB barrier=block | barrier=cycle_barrier | barrier=stile | > barrier=kissing_gate [0x660f resolution 24] > #RWB get lots of Unnamed Pillar. > #RWB Also fills up find>geographic for no good purpose so use arb > point > barrier=bollard | barrier=gate | barrier=block | barrier=stile {add > name='${barrier}'} [0x3200 resolution 24] > barrier=bus_trap | barrier=cycle_barrier | barrier=kissing_gate {add > name='${barrier|subst:"_=> "}'} [0x3200 resolution 24] > > Ticker > > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 16:33 +0000, Mike Baggaley wrote: > > Is it possible to not put POIs into the index, but still have them > > displayed? I would like to have gates and stiles on my map, but not > > have > > them searchable in the index. Is this possible? > > > > Cheers, > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gerd Petermann [mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com] > > Sent: 24 March 2017 16:25 > > To: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ? > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I think it depends on the style. The more indexable objects you > > create and > > the longer the names, the more memory is needed. > > Andrzej suggested not to put POI with type 0x28 into the index. Do > > you think > > this would help to reduce size in your case? > > See this thread: > > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/POI-indexing-problem-with-label-0x28 > > 00 > > -tt5889 > > 663.html > > > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > > von > > Thomas Morgenstern <webmaster at img2ms.de> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. März 2017 17:07:22 > > An: Development list for mkgmap > > Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ? > > > > Hi, I have a W10, 64 bit machine and 10 GB RAM. Since a few > > months > > i can > > not generate the mdr-file for Europa from > > www.Download.Geofabrik.de<http://www.Download.Geofabrik.de>;; In a > > first run i > > generate only all the maptiles. No Problem. in a second i will > > generate the > > overview, tdb and mdr. I start java -Xmx9800m -XX: > > -UseGCOverheadLimit > > jar > > mkgmap.jar code-page=1252 -family-id=1901 -x-split-name-index > > -index > > D:\Karten\Europa\*.img. > > > > and get the error. > > > > [cid:part1.6A605C7E.D89F4F60 at img2ms.de] > > > > with mkgmap-r3864 it get the same error. > > > > How many RAM must i have for Europa complete ?. In august 2016 it > > was > > possible to create the mdr with 6 GB RAM. But the filesize is growm > > ... > > > > thomas > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] RAM and mdr Europa ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list