[mkgmap-dev] How to deal with tag aeroway=runway either made as polygon or as line

Sun Nov 12 10:36:39 GMT 2017

Thanks for the quick answer, thats the style trick i'm not aware of


Am 12.11.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Joris Bo:
> Hallo Manfred
>
> Sounds like you use continue on the line? I also test for is_closed() on the line file
>
>
> #Lines - Aeroways
> #=======================================================================================
> aeroway = runway & is_closed() != true [0x10d08 resolution 20]
> aeroway = taxiway & is_closed() != true [0x10d09 resolution 22]
>   
>
> #polygons - Aeroways
> #=======================================================================================
> aeroway = airport [0x07 resolution 18]
> aeroway = aerodrome & landuse != military [0x07 resolution 20]
> aeroway = helipad | aeroway = runway | aeroway = taxiway [0x7f resolution 22]
> aeroway = apron [0x3a resolution 22]
> aeroway = terminal & building = * [0x3b00 resolution 22]
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Joris Bovens
>
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: mkgmap-dev [mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk] Namens Manfred Haiduk
> Verzonden: zaterdag 11 november 2017 23:14
> Aan: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] How to deal with tag aeroway=runway either made as polygon or as line
>
> Hi
>
> just now i stuck with the following rendering trouble. As you can see from the attached pictures, these two airports have identically tags for the runway, but the Wittmund runway is made out of a polygon and the Jever runway is made out of a line. If i put the rendering cmd into the line style file, Wittmund airport will be drawn with two runways and a gap in between. If i put the aeroway=runway item into the polygon style file, Wittmund will be drawn correctly, but Jever could not be drawn, as there is no polygon used for the runway.Using the aeroway=runway tag in both style files, will lead again Wittmund runway to be drawn as if there were two of them and no polygon underlying it. Is there any trick within the style file, to get a correct drawing with this inconsistency or is the only way to change, edit these airfield in the OSM database?
>

-- 

  Mit freundlichen Grüßen

#####################################################
Manfred Haiduk,
Zum Fischbach 9,
52393 Hürtgenwald
e-mail mhaiduk at t-online.de
#####################################################