[mkgmap-dev] DEM file and the block-size option
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sat Jan 6 08:52:24 GMT 2018
Andrzej, Steve, not sure what to do here. I agree that 2048 looks like a good default, at least for DEM tiles. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Andrzej Popowski <popej at poczta.onet.pl> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2017 20:03:33 An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM file and the block-size option Hi Gerd, > This disadvantage of a larger block-size is that your img files are > typically a bit larger. For small img yes. For bigger img larger block-size results in smaller img size, since FAT contains less records and is smaller. I think you simply could set block-size 2048 as default. -- Best regards, Andrzej _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM Noddy Guide
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM file and the block-size option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list