[mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation
From Henning Scholland osm at hscholland.de on Tue Jan 23 13:09:17 GMT 2018
For srtm I found elevation accuracy of 6m in wikipedia, so my 10m was not that unrealistic. Btw. We are talking about interpolating from hgt-data position to Garmin-data position, aren't we? For filling voids, it would be a good idea to use some spline interpolation as written here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuttle_Radar_Topography_Mission#Void-filled_SRTM_datasets Henning * * On 23.01.2018 20:59, Henning Scholland wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > I also suggest to make interpolation optional. > > So far I don't understand your argument. I agree, compilation time is > not the only criteria. The question is, what is the benefit for the user. > For example: If accuracy of srtm is +- 10m and the difference between > with/without interpolation is +-1m, then it's definitely not worth > spending any effort on interpolation. Only in cases, where interpolation > accuracy is on same level than srtm accuracy, it starting to be worth > spending time for it. > > Do you have any values for differences with/without interpolation with > same input data? > > Henning > > On 23.01.2018 20:22, Andrzej Popowski wrote: >> Hi Gerd, >> >> there are different kind of bicubic interpolations. I'm not good at >> this math, I think the previous version was actually bicubic spline >> interpolation. See other possibilities here: >> http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/cubic/Cubic_java.html >> >> I don't know, which type of spline or cubic interpolation is best for >> DEM. Maybe differences aren't big, but I think it is better to have >> good interpolation than fast one. You compile a map once but then many >> people can use it. >> >> It shouldn't be difficult to include an option like: >> --dem-interp=.. >> > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20180123/1fa222e5/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list