[mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Feb 19 09:11:32 GMT 2018
Hi Mike, sorry for the late response. I've just recognized the static modifier in maxjobs. I think it is better to use a getter instead, see attached modifed version of the patch. If you agree, I'll commit this version. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Mike Baggaley <mike at tvage.co.uk> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Februar 2018 17:18:15 An: 'Development list for mkgmap' Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Gerd, I misread the --max-jobs with no value functionality. Please find attached a revised patch that does function that way when the max-jobs option is specified with no value. Cheers, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Gerd Petermann [mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com] Sent: 16 February 2018 10:42 To: Mike Baggaley <mike at tvage.co.uk> Subject: AW: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Mike, without the patch the option --max-jos means: use as many threads as cores. Since mkgmap is normally very silent I would not print an information that just confirms that anything is normal. My personal preference would be to print much more information about performance, but my understanding is that the mkgmap users are happy with the silent behaviour. BTW: I'd also print a message that tells the user how to activate logging if it is not already activated. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: Mike Baggaley <mike at tvage.co.uk> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Februar 2018 11:20:03 An: 'Gerd Petermann' Betreff: RE: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Gerd, as the functionality of --max-jobs without a value is the same as not specifying the parameter (i.e. it is the default), it seems to me to be better for them to function the same. If you have specified --max-jobs without a value, why would you not want to know how many threads had been assigned? Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Gerd Petermann [mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com] Sent: 15 February 2018 08:54 To: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Mike, looks good to me. I am just not sure about the new stdout message "Setting max-jobs to 4" It appears when --max-jobs is not used (ok), but also when it is used without a parameter. In the latter case I would only print this message if the number of CPU cores is higher. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 19:38:06 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Mike, okay, I'll try it tomorrow. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Mike Baggaley <mike at tvage.co.uk> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 18:30:28 An: 'Steve Ratcliffe'; mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch I tried renaming the java library to force a failure and got a java error "Error occurred during initialization of VM" before any mkgmap code was executed, so to be on the safe side, I have removed that code and amended the message in the attached patch. Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Steve Ratcliffe [mailto:steve at parabola.me.uk] Sent: 13 February 2018 23:01 To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch Hi Mike > I could take out that bit of code, which is just determining how > much physical memory is installed, so that mkgmap won't suggest that the > user increases the available heap too much. It isn't used in determining a > value for maxjobs. Since it is just used for an informational message, you could just surround it with a try/catch block. Then if it doesn't exist on a particular it isn't a problem when using the downloaded pre-compiled distribution. Of course it would fail to compile on such a platform, but then hopefully someone will let us know and we can decide what to do then. Steve _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: maxjobs-v6.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 24396 bytes Desc: maxjobs-v6.patch URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20180219/1357d7bb/attachment-0001.obj>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] max-jobs patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list