[mkgmap-dev] Error in my style with Version mkgmap-r4136
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Wed Mar 28 17:53:22 BST 2018
Hi Gerd > looks good for me, although you may simplify the code in isIndexable(): > a) The expression ((ValueOp) op.getFirst()).isIndexable() appears three times > b) the term (op.getSecond().isType(VALUE) || op.getSecond().isType(FUNCTION) appears two times and I wonder why it is needed. > Do you have an example? The unit tests don't fail when I remove it. OK a lot of that is not needed any more. The attached patch returns isIndexable() to its simplest form and all the other code is changed to fit. Steve -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: expr-func2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 5017 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20180328/25b663e9/attachment.bin>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Error in my style with Version mkgmap-r4136
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Error in my style with Version mkgmap-r4136
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list