[mkgmap-dev] DEM contrast option?
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Thu Jul 5 19:20:44 BST 2018
You should only use one single resolution On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 19:31 jan meisters, <jan_m23 at gmx.net> wrote: > Tried a lot of dem-dist variations: fixed resolution as you hinted, > decreasing and even inverted steps. > Unfortunately nothing changed the shown behavior. > > What I´d like to see is the same CONTRAST in the shading over all > resolutions. > In higher resolutions the darks of the DEM are clearly brighter, whatever > dem-dists used. > With the blank screenshots I wanted to show that there is no additional > (higher resolution) polygon in my style eventually hiding the DEM. > > Had some success (at least on DEM contrasts) mixing levels and > overview-levels, but that obviously breaks the rest of the map. > > Jan > > > Am 04.07.2018 um 21:14 schrieb Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com>: > > if you have several dem resolution levels in mkgmap - then it will lose in > detail (in order to zoom in/out faster). You could just create the map is a > single dem resolution - then detail level is always the same. > > On 4 July 2018 at 18:52, jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net> wrote: > >> I just made my first map with the new DEM-option and I´m impressed. >> Pretty easy. >> But I wonder why DEM shading looses contrast in higher resolutions in >> BaseCamp: >> >> <1DEM_low.jpg><2DEM_higk.jpg> >> >> My Style has background poly 4a and 4b (both transparent), however they >> are not mentioned in polygons. I wouldn´t know how to tag them anyway. >> And even with a completely blanked typ-file the difference is visible: >> >> <3DEM_low-e.jpg><4DEM_high-e.jpg> >> >> HGT´s are 3“ data from viewfinderpanaramas.org >> >> To keep the contrasted DEM up to higher resolutions/zooms I played with >> all DEM-options from help, and also with transparencies, but that had no >> effect - the softer shading remains. >> >> I see the switch in Basecamp somewhere between assumed resolutions 20 and >> 22. >> How is this switch defined? Is there a value to adjust this? >> >> Jan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org <http://openmtbmap.org> & VeloMap.org > <http://velomap.org> > Schusterbergweg 32/8 > 6020 Innsbruck > Austria - Österreich > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20180705/bee1246d/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM contrast option?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] DEM contrast option?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list