[mkgmap-dev] probably dumb question about style type

Fri Sep 21 09:02:33 BST 2018

Well, no, this is silly, 0x52xx are for attractions, so yes I get
a camera, but probably not the correct one :(

On 9/21/18 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin wrote:
> I managed to get a camera icon using 0x5201
> 
> 
> No idea why it works though… I tried every not-completely-silly
> combination until I got something :)
> 
> 
> On 9/20/18 11:09 PM, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>> Hi Andrzej
>>
>>> I think that safe limit for subtype is 0x1F, but for many types
>>> values up to 0x3F can be used.
>>
>> Are the ones above 0x1f different though? Or is it just ignoring the
>> top bits?
>>
>> Is 0x3f a different icon to 0x1f for example?
>>
>> Steve
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20180921/a1c55254/attachment.sig>