[mkgmap-dev] Missing addr:place addresses

Mon Dec 3 21:23:29 GMT 2018

Thanks, I see some improvement.

> Possible problem:  I also see many roads in this area which are
> tagged as highway=unclassified which probably should betagged
> highway=service or residential, for example way 582373155.

I agree. I need to check this.

> Another problem is e.g. unnamed way 582525015:- Some numbers close to
> it have addr:place=Contrada Castelletta- One has addr:place=Contrada
> Spirito Santo addr:housenumber=6 (node 5967518378)Because of the
> different addr:place names the road gets two labels:label0 = "",
> label1=Contrada Castelletta and label2=Contrada Spirito Santo
> Now, when I search in MapSource for Number 6 , Street=Contrada
> Castelletta I find multiple places,one is the correct one from node
> 5993083300, the others are wrong. One of the wrong onesis the above
> node 5967518378.The patch doesn't help here, mkgmap has to split
> those roads instead of adding multiple labels for differentaddr:place
> values.  Needs more work...

I know. A similar thing also happens every time an addr:place address
is near a named road, you can find the number under the road name too.

Lorenzo

Il giorno lun, 03/12/2018 alle 15.54 +0000, Gerd Petermann ha scritto:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> attached is a small patch to change mkgmap so that it doesn't try to
> find a name for unnamed roads with road class > 0 or road speed >
> 2.It helps for the problem with way 209592070.Possible problem:  I
> also see many roads in this area which are tagged as
> highway=unclassified which probably should betagged highway=service
> or residential, for example way 582373155.Another problem is e.g.
> unnamed way 582525015:- Some numbers close to it have
> addr:place=Contrada Castelletta- One has addr:place=Contrada Spirito
> Santo addr:housenumber=6 (node 5967518378)Because of the different
> addr:place names the road gets two labels:label0 = "",
> label1=Contrada Castelletta and label2=Contrada Spirito Santo
> Now, when I search in MapSource for Number 6 , Street=Contrada
> Castelletta I find multiple places,one is the correct one from node
> 5993083300, the others are wrong. One of the wrong onesis the above
> node 5967518378.The patch doesn't help here, mkgmap has to split
> those roads instead of adding multiple labels for differentaddr:place
> values.  Needs more work...
> Gerd
> 
> ________________________________________Von: mkgmap-dev <
> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Lorenzo
> Mastrogiacomi <lomastrolo at gmail.com>Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Dezember
> 2018 19:46An: Development list for mkgmapBetreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev]
> Missing addr:place addresses
> If I understand correctly I would say yes.unclassified roads should
> be tagged with name=* in osm if they have a name and should not take
> names from nearby roads.
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> Il giorno dom, 02/12/2018 alle 18.29 +0000, Gerd Petermann ha
> scritto:
> This doesn't happen because of road merging, it is a - normally -
> wanted result of the housenumber processing.
> Maybe I should change the code so that unclassified roads are not
> treated like service roads here.
> 
> Gerd
> 
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <
> <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> 
> > im Auftrag von Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <
> 
> <mailto:lomastrolo at gmail.com>
> lomastrolo at gmail.com
> 
> 
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2018 19:22
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Missing addr:place addresses
> 
> It seems to me that road merging in presence of addr:place addresses
> causes the incorrect propagation of labels to nearby streets.
> 
> For example, I see this unnamed road gets the label "Strada
> Provinciale Potentina".
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209592070>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209592070
> 
> 
> This name does not come from an address, it is the name of a nearby
> street and should not be here.
> 
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> 
> Il giorno dom, 02/12/2018 alle 17.25 +0000, Gerd Petermann ha
> scritto:
> 
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> 
> an unnamed service road should solve the problem because the numbers
> are not assigned to the same road.
> 
> 
> Gerd
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> 
> Von: mkgmap-dev <
> 
> <mailto:
> <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> 
> 
> <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> 
> 
> 
> im Auftrag von Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <
> 
> <mailto:
> <mailto:lomastrolo at gmail.com>
> lomastrolo at gmail.com
> 
> 
> <mailto:lomastrolo at gmail.com>
> lomastrolo at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2018 18:17
> 
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> 
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Missing addr:place addresses
> 
> 
> Ok Gerd, no worries :)
> 
> 
> I guess a service road should also have a name and different from the
> main road to avoid merging because in my previous example there were
> already several unnamed roads around the housenumber. Right?
> 
> <
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5569912919>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5569912919
> 
> 
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5569912919>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5569912919
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> 
> Il giorno mer, 28/11/2018 alle 08.22 +0000, Gerd Petermann ha
> scritto:
> 
> 
> Hi Lorenzo,
> 
> 
> 
> I don't see an easy solution for that problem in mkgmap. All I can
> suggest now is to map a service road where this happens :-(
> 
> 
> 
> Gerd
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________mkgmap-dev mailing 
> listmkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20181203/ed0f1486/attachment-0001.html>