[mkgmap-dev] default style improvements

Sun Jan 6 19:37:50 GMT 2019

It's not what I meant.

The example you provided is a multipolygon relation and multipolygons
are always areas regardless if area=yes is set or not.
So this is not a valid example, actually I can not find one really
evident of missing area=yes on pedestrian areas.

Lorenzo

Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 17.37 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha scritto:
> Hi
> 
> I don't see anything in the OSM definition of a square that requires
> it
> to come from a multipolygon relation
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
> 
> 
> Ticker
> 
> On Sun, 2019-01-06 at 17:46 +0100, Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote:
> > Il giorno dom, 06/01/2019 alle 12.45 +0000, Ticker Berkin ha
> > scritto:
> > > Hi Lorenzo
> > > 
> > > I know that the OSM definition says square should have area=yes,
> > > but
> > > I
> > > find a vast number where there is no area tag and they seem to be
> > > square/piazza, eg
> > > 
> > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5174171
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > This is a multipolygon.
> > The current rule to handle this with the mkgmap:mp_created tag is
> > fine
> > for a default style in my opinion.
> > 
> > 
> > > With Italy data from July 2018, I get about 5000
> > > highway=pedestrian
> > > polygons without an area tag, and, from a small sample, about 1
> > > in
> > > 3
> > > look like piazza.
> > > The only effect is that a polygon is generated, it doesn't effect
> > > routes. I prefer to see the possible square rendered.
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't. 1 in 3 correct is not so good :)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Ticker
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Lorenzo
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > 
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> 
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> 