[mkgmap-dev] Turn Restrictions using three ways - design guide for OSM mappers?
From blc blc+mkgmap at mail.vanade.com on Sat Oct 5 05:31:24 BST 2019
Hello, I thank all who have been working on this neat program to allow our otherwise old Garmins sit in the dust heap when we can't afford to subscribe to new maps. I've been trying to improve the quality of OSM by fixing the errors that mkgmap emits, which a lot of times mirrors what's seen in KeepRight. However there's one variant of turn restriction I've noticed that warns in mkgmap but do not show up in KeepRight (and iD seems to understand this type of turn restriction) - the way-way-way type restriction where three connected ways are in series for non no-u-turn restrictions. example: Turn restriction (only_left_turn) 2256354 (at https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.777585&mlon=-122.319488&zoom=17) check: 'via' way(s) are used in only_left_turn restriction The way-way-way type is the proper method for restricting u-turns on dual carriageway roads which is understood by mkgmap. On the other hand, iD and KeepRight it seems to be valid to do way-way-way instead of way-POINT-way for no/only left/right turn restrictions, no/only straight on restrictions, etc. I've seen a lot of the non no-u-turn way-way-way restrictions in the USA. These type of non no-u-turn restrictions seems to cause a warning in mkgmap and probably not translating them. My question is that should these be supported in mkgmap, or should these be fixed in OSM so that they are simple way-via-way despite iD and KeepRight seem to claim them valid? Or perhaps way-way-way is deprecated but still supported by OSM but should be changed to way-point-way? way-point-way = relation from: some-street-way via: some-intersection-point to: some-street-way (this is the most common type of turn restriction) way-way-way = relation from: some-street-way via: some-street-way to: some-street-way (this is necessary specifically for dual carriageway u-turn restriction, but it's used for other types as well which mkgmap complains about.) Thanks for shedding some light on the discrepancy here! Note: I'm currently depending on OpenMapChest data for mkgmap runs as my computer and internet connection are not large or fast enough for the quantity of data I'd like to work with.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] 'loose' gates
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Turn Restrictions using three ways - design guide for OSM mappers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list