[mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

Sat Oct 12 16:33:06 BST 2019

Hi Ticker,

I just committed r4302, please try with that.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 17:07
An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD

Hi Gerd

I'm just starting to test this, but looking through the log lines (I
get 1260 of them for 2 tiles) like:

SEVE: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.StyledConverter  74210001.osm.pbf:
check: road without connection is not written to NOD Newport to Cowes
cycleway (OSM id 562475661) 50.749482,-1.294847

there are some, eg the above, that I don't expect to see as it is
joined at both ends. I'll continue to investigate and I'm loading onto
my device to test.

Ticker

On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 10:17 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried to work out under what conditions we need routing nodes
> when using OSM input (not polish *mp):
> See
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4300
> for details.
>
> Please try the new version with a few tiles (maybe 4).
> The version r4301 produces some messages like
> SCHWERWIEGEND (StyledConverter): d:\mkgmap\test\resources\in\osm\uk
> -test-1.osm.gz: check: road without connection is not written to NOD
> Wildwood Rise (OSM id 4013934) 51.570805,-0.178385
> SCHWERWIEGEND (StyledConverter): f:\osm\wildeshausen.o5m: check: road
> without connection is not written to NOD (OSM id 243082453)
> 52.903136,8.414926
>
> These are not errors, they just help to find the places where the
> result of the branch version is (very) different.
>
> Please compare a map produced with the trunk version (r4299) with a
> new map produced with the branch version and check address search and
> routing at some places printed with these error messages.
> Please try also new experimental option --x-all-roads-to-nod . If
> given, mkgmap will add at least one routing node to each routable
> line so that it is added to NOD.
>
> I hope the program is stable, so you should not see crashes, else
> please let me know details.
> Pleaase let me know which result you prefer.
> 1) trunk r4299
> 2) branch r4301 WITHOUT option --x-all-roads-to-nod
> 3) branch r4301 WITH option --x-all-roads-to-nod
>
>  1) should give the largest file, 2) the smallest,  3) between
>
> Gerd
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev