[mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Sat Oct 12 18:34:29 BST 2019
Hi Gerd I was thinking of a threshold (maybe < 5) and then not adding any of them to NOD. The reason is that a while ago I found many instances where tracks lead up to the edge of car-parks but didn't join to each other or the car -park access road and so walking routing, where one was expected to cross the car-park, didn't work. I tried adding a footway around the edge of the car-park and this helped in a lot of cases but I got driving route-calculation-error in or out of the car-park if the access road wasn't correctly specified. Your latest change will help in a lot of instances but sometimes there car-park was defined by more than 1 line. Ticker On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 10:10 -0700, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Ticker Berkin wrote > > Do you attempt to isolate small road networks that are not > > connected to > > the rest of the system or just a single road? > > Not yet. Do you think about some kind of threshold value giving the > minimal > number of connections or maybe a bbox size or a sum of road lengths? > if the > isolated network is "small" we might not add any of its roads to NOD. > Is that what you think about? > > Gerd > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Please test branch NET-no-NOD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list