[mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Nov 5 10:40:10 GMT 2019
Hi Ticker, OK for the "or end" but why would you prefer the American spelling? Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. November 2019 11:12 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch Hi Gerd Looks good, but should add, after "island as a start", " or end". Also fix "metres" to "meters" Ticker On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 09:18 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks for all the input. Here is my 2nd try: > --check-routing-island-len=INTEGER > Routing islands are small road networks which are not > connected to other > roads. A typical case is a footway that is not connected to > the main > road network, or a small set of ways on the inner courtyard > of a large > building > These islands can cause problems if you try to calculate a > route and the GPS > selects a point on the island as a start. It will fail to > calculate the > route even if a major road is only a few steps away. If this > option is > specified, then mkgmap will detect these islands. If the > value is set to > zero, mkgmap will simply report the islands (you will need to > set > uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net.RoadNetwork.level=INFO to > activate logging of > the message). If the value is greater than zero, mkgmap will > mark islands > with a total length less than the specified value in metres > as not routable. > Reasonable values are 500 or higher. > The default is for the check to not take place. > If any of the roads forming the island touches a tile > boundary or > a country border the island is ignored, as it may be > connected to other > roads in a different tile. > See also option --add-boundary-nodes-at-admin-boundaries. > > > As Arndt has pointed out there is a possible problem with the island > detection when the input file doesn't cover the tile boundary. > This is quite normal. When you split eg. germany-latest.osm.pbf > you'll get lots of tiles at the country boundary. Since Geofabrik > uses simplified polygons you will see many small islands next to the > cutting polygon. These islands may be connected to the road network > in the neighbour country without touching the country border. > Of course this is also the case when you use a polygon in splitter > (options --polygon-file or --polygon-desc-file). > So, I would not use this test for OSM quality checks (geofabric > provides this in the routing view of OSM inspector). > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2019 18:17 > An: Felix Hartmann > Betreff: AW: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch > > Hi Felix, > > the number is about the total length of the roads in the island, > measured in meters. > > Gerd > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2019 17:51 > An: Gerd Petermann > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch > > Ah okay - so it should be explained that the Integer is the number of > roads which form an island. e.g. 100 so anything below 200 100 > segments is still an island and thereby routing disabled. > That is quite interesting then and an addition (still > set_unconnected_type=XXXXX is then pretty obsolete if its only about > making the road unroutable). > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:40, Gerd Petermann < > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Felix, > > mkgmap:set_unconnected_type works very different. > 1) It only detects single roads not connected to other roads, the > island detection also finds multiple roads which are only connected > to each other > 2) the island detection adds the line as a road to NET, it just > doesn't add it to NOD. So address search works as usual. > (I am not yet 100% sure if this is a good idea, have to do more > testing here) > > Island detection happens after processing of > mkgmap:set_unconnected_type, right before the AngleChecker is called. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Felix > Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>> > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2019 17:27 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch > > Hi > So basically this is a global: > > set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none; > > Or is there a difference? I've used the unconnected_type and > semi_connected type basically for all routable lines in my style > -file. The unconnected_type is now obsolete if you just used to > disable routing by setting an unroutable type - correct? > > Have you tested that the global option is run after > semi_connected_type and unconnected_type? Because first the style > should be able to remove them or change them to unroutable type - > then leftover islands should be covered with this method. > > > > Felix > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:06, Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<ma > ilto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: > rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>>> wrote: > Hi > > I think the default should be either: > Don't check for routing islands > or: > Check for and remove islands of any length > but I don't feel that strongly about this aspect. > > In the documentation, it should mention the effect of a road meeting > a > tile boundary or boundary nodes added at admin boundaries. > > I've been using this feature for a couple of weeks now and it has > stopped a lot of "Route Calculation Error"s - Thanks Gerd. > > Ticker > > On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 15:37 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > > > as always the information is written with the logger (1). You have > > to > > activate logging at info level with > > uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net<http://uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net> > > <http://uk.me.parabola.imgfmt.app.net>.RoadNetwork.level=INFO > > > > (1) > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mkgmap/dev#Enabling_Debugging > > > > Using a negative value for NUM means that mkgmap doesn't calculate > > the islands at all, using > > 0 means that it only reports the islands. If you want to remove > > islands you can start with a value like > > 500. The default is 0. > > > > Gerd > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> im Auftrag > > von Pinns UK <osm at pinns.co.uk<mailto:osm at pinns.co.uk><mailto: > > osm at pinns.co.uk<mailto:osm at pinns.co.uk>>> > > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2019 16:29 > > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch > > > > Hi Gerd > > > > Thanks for all you work with regards routing islands! > > > > a) Is there a way of finding out how many .if any. routing islands > > were found given a certain length? > > > > b) if NUM is negative is there any point in adding --check-routing > > -island-len=NUM > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > On 04/11/2019 13:58, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think the work on the branch is almost done. > > Attached is a patch to add documentation for the new option. > > Please help to improve it: > > > > --check-routing-island-len=NUM > > Routing islands are small road networks which are not > > connected to other > > roads. Typical case is a footway that is not connected to > > the > > main road > > network. These islands can cause problems if you try to > > calculate a route > > and Garmin selects a point on the island as a start. It > > will > > fail to > > calulate the route even if a major road is only a few steps > > away. > > When calculating the NOD data mkgmap detects the islands. > > The > > option > > --check-routing-island-len=NUM can be used to tell mkgmap > > that islands with > > a total length below NUM meters should not be written to > > NOD. > > The effect is > > that the corresponding roads are visible as usual but they > > are not > > routable. > > A negative value for NUM means that mkgmap skips the island > > check. > > > > ciao > > Gerd > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > Schusterbergweg 32/8 > 6020 Innsbruck > Austria - Österreich > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > Schusterbergweg 32/8 > 6020 Innsbruck > Austria - Österreich > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] documentation of new option in branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list