[mkgmap-dev] change handling of railway=abandoned
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Sat Jan 18 19:02:28 GMT 2020
Hi I have this in my style: railway=abandoned & highway!=* & ((bicycle=* & bicycle!=no & bicycle!=proposed) | (foot=* & foot!=no & foot!=proposed)) {set highway=path} highway=path might be converted by later rules to bridleway, footway or cycleway Ticker On Sat, 2020-01-18 at 18:51 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi all, > > the default style has this rule: > # following really should be removed, but see: > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2016q3/025104.html > railway=abandoned [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 22] > > I agree with Ticker that it is not a good idea to make such a way > routable. I would accept this when it has also a tag like > bicycle=yes. I found a few ways like this, e.g. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122268824 (I wonder why nobody > added a highway tag since 2011) > BUT we should not assume access=yes for a railway=abandoned. So, what > about this: > railway=abandoned {add access=no} [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1 > resolution 22] > > Gerd > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] change handling of railway=abandoned
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] change handling of railway=abandoned
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list