[mkgmap-dev] Work on is_in branch
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Wed Feb 12 15:55:41 GMT 2020
Hi Ticker, I found it difficult to test the real style function, that's why I moved all the logic out of it. I am looking forward to your solution. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 16:47 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Work on is_in branch Hi Gerd The re-structuring makes this difficult. I propose a function in IsInUtilTest with the same interface as calcInsideness from IsInUtil that somehow drives the real function IsIn Function to collect and build the IN/ON/OUT intflag. Ticker On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 15:28 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > did you run the unit tests? This should download a newer version of > the samples. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 16:23 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Work on is_in branch > > Hi Gerd > > Here it is - changes are: > > - Some restructuring with early stopping where possible. > > - Merging polygons for POINT IN/ON test so a point on shared boundary > becomes IN rather than ON. > > - Not merging polygons when no need. > > - Make the function cacheable, so that there is negligible cost to > the > second call: > highway=path & is_in(landuse, residential, all)=true [0xAA] > highway=path & is_in(landuse, residential, all)=false [0xBB] > > - Improved the layout of documentation in the Style Manual. > > - Fixed quite a few problems. > > I've left quite a lot of debug in for the moment, I think there will > still be work to do. > > It gives correct answers to 'point-on.osm'. I haven't worked through > is > -in-hook-sample-v3.osm yet because I wanted to get this revision out > to > replace faults in the previous versions. > > Ticker > > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 15:49 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > Hi Ticker, > > > > whatever you plan to do. I moved the code to the lib because it is > > easier to write a unit test. > > I would not invest much time to avoid a few tests which only happen > > in very rare cases. Makes testing more complicated and code less > > readable. > > > > Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Work on is_in branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Work on is_in branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list