[mkgmap-dev] More method options for is_in function
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Thu Feb 13 10:16:05 GMT 2020
Hi Gerd I overrode getCacheTag() to fix this aspect, and you overrode toString() for something relating to the common sub-expressions; in both cases including the 'kind' and all the parameters. Yesterday, experimenting, I found it was consistent about create 2 instances, augmenting the same one twice and then using just that one for the actual work, but this was when the calls were in the same section. So, sometime I should investigate what happen when there valid identical calls in 2 sections. Ticker On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 09:53 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > I think CachedFunction can't be used without changes. It uses > getName() which just returns "is_in" (no parameters). > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2020 10:26 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] More method options for is_in function > > Hi Arndt > > you have an include 'inc/access' in styles_base/points and > styles_gravel/points > > which gives the error about unsupported options. > > The crash is related: because the calls are textually identical, the > optimiser semi-tries to share them between points and lines > processing, > it initializes one instance only, but later the correct ones are > called > for the 2 contexts. I introduced this assertion error in the last > update to catch strange things like this happening. Before it would > have quietly returned "false" > > Ticker > > > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 06:37 +0100, Arndt Röhrig wrote: > > Hi Ticker, > > > > mkgmap tell me: > > > > 6:33:39,37 - mkgmap .\tools\mkgmap-is-in-r4446 Speiche_Fabrik > > Error in style: Error: (inc/access:73): Error: Third parameter > > 'all' > > of function is_in is not supported for this style section, valid > > are: > > [in, in_or_on, on] > > Error in style: Error: (inc/access:73): Error: Third parameter > > 'all' > > of function is_in is not supported for this style section, valid > > are: > > [in, in_or_on, on] > > Error in style: Error: (inc/access:73): Error: Third parameter > > 'all' > > of function is_in is not supported for this style section, valid > > are: > > [in, in_or_on, on] > > Error in style: Error: (inc/access:73): Error: Third parameter > > 'all' > > of function is_in is not supported for this style section, valid > > are: > > [in, in_or_on, on] > > Could not open style > > > > > > If i move the "is_in" command to the line file, mkgmap say: > > > > 6:30:43,78 - mkgmap .\tools\mkgmap-is-in-r4446 Speiche_Fabrik > > java.lang.AssertionError: invoked the non-augmented instance > > at > > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.function.IsInFunction.calcImpl(IsInF > > un > > ction.java:119) > > at > > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.function.CachedFunction.value(Cached > > Fu > > nction.java:61) > > at > > uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.eval.EqualsOp.eval(EqualsOp.java:33) > ... > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] More method options for is_in function
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] More method options for is_in function
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list