[mkgmap-dev] Explanation of the is_in function
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Fri May 22 21:44:25 BST 2020
Hi Gerd I think I understand what is going wrong. I'll do another patch tomorrow. Ticker On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 13:36 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > the patched version still returns ON for a Coord which is not ON and > thus doesn't work with my example. > The result doesn't depend on the position of the last point of the > way as long as it is builds a nearly or exactly straight line with > two nodes of the shape. > > Your algorithm returns true for each such point, even when it is 100m > away from any shape vertex. > See my new example where A,B and C build a straight line. Another > node is very close to the edge but still returns IN (OK) > > Gerd > > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 17:07 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Explanation of the is_in function > > Hi Gerd > > Here is patch that prevents possible underflow when node is very > close > to an almost horizontal or vertical line and incorrect results when > exactly on this line. > > Ticker > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Explanation of the is_in function
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Explanation of the is_in function
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list