[mkgmap-dev] Virtual paths
From Greg Troxel gdt at lexort.com on Tue Jul 28 23:33:04 BST 2020
ael <witwall3 at disroot.org> writes: >> Feel free; I don't expect that to go well. > > As far as I can see, the current discussion is just a special case of a > general problem with OSM. Consider a park with grass cover with open > access, or even just an area of, say open access moorland where it is > possible & sensible to walk anywhere. As far as I know, all the OSM > routers will fail to construct a route across such a place (presumably > a straight line) in the absence of an explicit way of some sort. > > Adding a relation of the sort I suggested which would be verifiable and > objective would solve the problem. Is there a better solution? I didn't say your idea made no sense. I said that I didn't expect the discussion to go well :-) But don't let my guess stop you. I prefer soemthing like a polygon of type highway=path that covers the free-routable space, to which regular ways are connected to. Sort of the same thing, but without adding relations in, and treating free-routable areas as first-class items similar to line-routable ways. > Of course, routers would not pick this up immmediately. > As for mkgmap, I see that the Garmin firmware probably needs to support > it somehow. Are we sure that Garmin doesn't have something that can > interpolate between routing points? I guess that navit could probably > be extended to do this sort of thing. My impression is that people synthesize a bunch of diagonals when there is an erea, for routers that don't do areas.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Virtual paths
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Virtual paths
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list