[mkgmap-dev] splitter performance with "osm.pbf" compared to "o5m"

Sat Dec 19 12:37:03 GMT 2020

|Hi Gerd,|

|here are the two log files.
|

|http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/491/logs.tgz|

|Ciao,|

|Franco
|

Am 19.12.20 um 12:09 schrieb Gerd Petermann:
> Hi Franco,
>
> OK, I guess 2048 areas should be enough and memory is for sure enough. The major reason that I added o5m support to splitter was that this format was much faster to read, esp. when the file is read multiple times some passes only need relations or only ways. The pbf format didn't support this as well, but I thought that I also improved handling of that format.
> If you like you can zip the two logs and upload them to http://files.mkgmap.org.uk .
>
> I'll do some tests on my own machine again.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Franco Bez <franco.bez at web.de>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Dezember 2020 11:45
> An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter performance with "osm.pbf" compared to       "o5m"
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> thanks for the fast reply.
>
> I tried "java -ea -Xmx16G -Xms16G" but this doen't make any difference
> on my machine, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 32GB Ram 2 SSDs 1TB each
>
> see the log extracts below.
>
> Ciao,
>
>   Franco
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20201219/63b08117/attachment.sig>