[mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
From Carlos Dávila carlos at alternativaslibres.org on Sun Dec 27 18:07:27 GMT 2020
I had removed --order-by-decreasing-area from my command for DEM maps, but --no-order-by-decreasing-area seems to fix the problem by now. By the way, this option is not documented in options file and I can't find it in the code. Is --no a general switch for all options or is it a particular case for order-by-decreasing-area? I don't remember having seen it before. El 27/12/20 a las 10:36, Gerd Petermann escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > I agree that --order-by-decreasing-area is to blame. This option seems to disturb the calculation of the overview map, and maybe the extreme size of the tile plays another role here. > > I hope Ticker can help here, I think the option supresses the merging of shapes, and this is probably not a good idea for the 0x4a shapes. > > As a work-around for you: > Add option --no-order-by-decreasing-area at the end(!) of the parameter list so that the overview map is created without this option. This seems to fix the problem on my machine. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Dezember 2020 09:36 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map > > Hi Carlos, > > reg. the routing data: You can run display tool to check yourself, but the error is either in mkgmap or in display tool. My command looks like this : > java -ea -cp d:\display\dist\display.jar;d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar test.check.NodCheck -vv --tab-zero=0 51145001.img > nodcheck.51145001.img 2> crash_nod > It would be easier if you would post a link to your style. > > I am now able to reproduce the display error using this command > java -Xmx6G -ea -jar d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar --dem=f:\srtm3 --dem-poly=e:\carlos\australia.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 --gmapi --show-profiles=1 --bounds=f:\osm\bounds.zip --precomp-sea=f:\osm\sea.zip --route --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,left --road-name-config=d:\mkgmap\resources\roadNameConfig.txt e:\carlos\51145001.o5m > > and the overview map has the same amount of 0x4a and 0x4b polygons as yours from 11-error.zip. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <carlos at alternativaslibres.org> > Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Dezember 2020 19:12 > An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map > > I'm sorry for the late response and for breaking the thread, but I > didn't receive Gerd's last message, so I've had to copy it from mailing > list archive. Reply inline. > > OK, I think I understand what problem you see. I used JaVaWa > MapConverter to install the map in 11-error.zip and 12-OK.zip played > with it. With 11-error.zip only the data from the overview map is > displayed when I zoom to e.g. S21.71088 E114.92708, while 12-OK.zip > shows more details (this is with MapSource, in Basecamp I see details in > both maps). > > Yes, everything to the North of approx. S32.39125 is missing. > > I tried to analyse your files and I see three suspicious things so far: > > 1) The routing data seems to be wrong, NodCheck reports "Could not find > node for road 38a61 nod2=124c8 " for both tiles. I don't see such an > error with the default style. > > How can I check that? If both tiles are affected, probably this is not > related with current issue, but other maps produced with the same style > will also be wrong regarding routing. > > 2) The bad overview map contains a lot more 0x4a polygons. This is > probably caused by the --order-by-decreasing-area, and I am not sure why > this happens. > > Do you think the problem is in the overview map or may be in tile map? > If I open tile in MapEdit++ the number of non polygon elements is almost > the same in wrong and correct maps. For example, number of roads is > exactly the same. It seems as if something is masking part of the tile > in MapSource (also in BaseCamp in my case); elements are there, but you > can't see them. > > 3) You use a special version of mkgmap, so please try also with the > latest version. > > With latest mkgmap and default style problem persists. > > My first guess was that the bad NOD file may cause this but the problem > doesn't disappear when I remove the file 51145001.NOD, so this is > probably not to blame. Same for the 51145001.DEM file. > > I tried to reproduce the possible problem with the 0x4a tiles using the > default style with this command java -Xmx4G -jar map.jar --route --gmapi > --bounds=f:\osm\bounds.zip --precomp-sea=f:\osm\sea.zip > --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" > --order-by-decreasing-area --location-autofill=is_in,nearest > f:\dwnload\temp\51145001.o5m but my overview map contains the same > number of 0x4a tiles as your good map. > > I cannot reproduce your DEM data because I don't know the polygon file > (polygons/$pais.poly). Maybe I can reproduce the 0x4a problem when you > create the test files again without --remove-ovm-work-files=true. > > You can download polygon file from here > <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/australia.poly> and ovm from here > <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/ovm_51145001.img>. > > El 22/12/20 a las 18:05, Carlos Dávila escribió: >> I'm sorry, probably I didn't explain well enough. >> >> Overview is always correct, the problem affects only tiles. As you saw >> in the screenshots of my first mail, they are different in size, but >> they are generated from the same input files, so they should have the >> same size. If you zoom in to an area that should be included in a >> tile, only overview map is shown, no detailed map. Even more, when you >> zoom in, at the given point where detailed map appears, tile boundary >> jumps to the correct size, but nothing but overview is displayed >> outside the "pruned" tile. >> >> You can download correct and wrong files from the links below and play >> with them to get a better idea of the problem. They correspond to >> first tile of Australia as shown in my screenshots. >> >> https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/11-error.zip >> >> https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/12-OK.zip >> >> Error was generated with java -Xmx27G -ea >> -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar >> --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt >> --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 -c >> opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 >> --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --family-name="OSM >> $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} >> --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --reduce-point-density=4 >> --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area >> --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON $LANGUAGE >> --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true >> 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt >> >> OK was generated with java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties >> -jar mkgmap.jar >> --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt >> --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --overview-dem-dist=276160 -c >> opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --show-profiles=1 >> --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --family-name="OSM >> $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} >> --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --reduce-point-density=4 >> --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" >> --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON $LANGUAGE >> --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true >> 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt >> >> Although removing --overview-dem-dist solved the issue in my first >> test (see command below, correct output), after a lot of tests >> removing options one by one from the original command, finally it >> seems the problem is caused by option --order-by-decreasing-area (or >> the combination of both). >> >> java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar >> --dem=hgt/LIDAR-Sonny,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt >> --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi >> --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route >> --country-name=$PAIS --country-abbr=${ABR} --area-name="$MAPA" >> --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} >> --product-version=$VERSION --series-name="OSM-$MAPA-DEM" >> --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} >> --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG >> --process-destination --process-exits --housenumbers >> --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:0" >> --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas --link-pois-to-ways >> --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON >> --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares >> --license-file=license_OSM_${HGT} --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE >> --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio --remove-ovm-work-files=true >> 51145001.o5m tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt >> >> El 22/12/20 a las 10:15, Gerd Petermann escribió: >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> It seems I still don't understand what the problem is or how to >>> reproduce it. >>> I tried this command and the overview map looks OK: >>> java -Xmx4G -jar d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar --dem=f:\srtm3 >>> --overview-dem-dist=128000 --show-profiles=1 --gmapi >>> f:\dwnload\temp\51145001.o5m >>> >>> If it is related to the DEM data I probably cannot help much. You may >>> try a slightly different value for the --overview-dem-dist option or >>> a modified polygon >>> given with the --dem-poly option. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag >>> von Carlos Dávila <carlos at alternativaslibres.org> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Dezember 2020 22:09 >>> An: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map >>> >>> The problem seems to be caused by overview DEM. If I remove >>> --overview-dem-dist option tile is complete in MapSource. The issue can >>> be reproduced with this tile >>> <https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/51145001.o5m> and HGT from >>> vierfinderpanoramas3 >>> >>> El 18/12/20 a las 11:48, Gerd Petermann escribió: >>>> Hi Carlos, >>>> >>>> not sure if I understand what the problem is. The two screenshots >>>> show completely different tile boundaries, so they were not created >>>> from the same splitter output. >>>> >>>> Gerd >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag >>>> von Carlos Dávila <cardavilam at gmail.com> >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020 23:44 >>>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>>> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map >>>> >>>> I build several types of map (OSM, OSM+contour lines, maps for trucks >>>> and OSM+DEM) for the same area, using same input files. I split >>>> country.o5m with splitter and then use the same template.args output by >>>> splitter for all maps, just changing mapname for the different types of >>>> map. Given that, all resulting mapsets should have the same tiles, but >>>> tiles in DEM map are smaller than in the other types. They share >>>> part of >>>> the boundaries (usually two of them) with other types, but other >>>> boundaries are moved in, reducing displayed tile size. See attached >>>> screenshots. However, file size is the same (discounting *.DEM) for >>>> each >>>> tile in *.gmap subfolders. >>>> >>>> Command is quite similar for OSM and OSM+DEM maps: >>>> >>>> java -Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar -c >>>> opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi --bounds=bounds.zip >>>> --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route --country-name=$PAIS >>>> --country-abbr=${ABR} >>>> --area-name=$MAPA --family-name="OpenStreetMap $MAPA" >>>> --family-id=1${FID} --product-version=$VERSION >>>> --series-name="OSM-$MAPA" >>>> --overview-mapname=${ABR}1${FID} >>>> --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}1${FID}000 >>>> --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG --process-destination --process-exits >>>> --housenumbers --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, >>>> 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas >>>> --report-similar-arcs --report-dead-ends=2 --link-pois-to-ways >>>> --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON >>>> --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares >>>> --license-file=license_OSM >>>> --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE --road-name-config=${CONFIG} >>>> --style=mio --check-styles -c $pais.args tmp/${ABR}1${FID}.txt >>>> >>>> java --Xmx27G -ea -Dlog.config=logging.properties -jar mkgmap.jar >>>> --dem=hgt/LIDAR,hgt/ALOS,hgt/VIEW1,hgt/SRTM1,hgt/EU-DEM,hgt/VIEW3,hgt >>>> --dem-poly=polygons/$pais.poly --dem-dists=3312,6624,9936,13248,26512 >>>> --overview-dem-dist=128000 -c opciones_comunes $CODEPAGE --gmapi >>>> --show-profiles=1 --bounds=bounds.zip --precomp-sea=sea.zip --route >>>> --country-name=$PAIS --country-abbr=${ABR} --area-name="$MAPA" >>>> --family-name="OSM $MAPA DEM" --family-id=5${FID} >>>> --product-version=$VERSION --series-name="OSM-$MAPA-DEM" >>>> --overview-mapname=${ABR}5${FID} >>>> --overview-mapnumber=${GRUPO}5${FID}000 >>>> --name-tag-list=$NAMETAG --process-destination --process-exits >>>> --housenumbers --reduce-point-density=4 --polygon-size-limits="24:12, >>>> 18:10, 16:0" --order-by-decreasing-area --add-pois-to-areas >>>> --link-pois-to-ways --location-autofill=is_in,nearest >>>> --drive-on=detect,$DRIVEON --check-roundabouts >>>> --check-roundabout-flares >>>> --license-file=license_OSM_${HGT} --copyright-file=copyright $LANGUAGE >>>> --road-name-config=${CONFIG} --style=mio >>>> --remove-ovm-work-files=true -c >>>> ${pais}-DEM.args tmp/${ABR}5${FID}.txt >>>> >>>> Both OSM and OSM+DEM maps can be downloaded from >>>> https://alternativaslibres.org/en/downloads.php#Oceania >>>> >>>> Any idea why this happens? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list