[mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?

Sun Feb 21 17:04:04 GMT 2021

(Still problems with attachments. Now with link)

Hi Ticker,

I want to ask for relevant swimmings, one after another, and after every rule exclude further swimmings inside aleady matched areas.
In the end the style should dismiss e.g. leisure=swimming_pools which lay in a (leisure=stadium & sport=swimming) already matched:

1.	leisure=stadium & sport=swimming {name '${name} (stadium swim)‘ | '(stadium swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
	sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true & is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
2.	leisure=water_park & sport=swimming {name '${name} (waterpark swim)‘ | '(waterpark swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
	sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, water_park,in_or_on)=true & is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
3.	leisure=swimming_pool & sport=swimming {name '${name} (pool swim)‘ | ‚(pool swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
	sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, swimming_pool,in_or_on)=true & is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
4.	…

With the above ruleset I have correct results for nodes so far, but not for polygons.
The is_in-rule seems to lack the epression of is_n(leisure=stadium & sport=swimming), instead matches a polygons own swimming as well - what I don´t want.
But I´ve got no clue how to write it.

In swim.osm the surrounding left stadium has swimming, the right one not. Inside both stadium, water_park and sports_centre as area and poi. (See http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/500 for the following screenshots)

Above ruleset gives this: 1-result.jpg
In left stadium pois for stadium/swim (area, area inside, poi inside), nothing else: correct.
In right stadium pois for all swim inside except for the areas: wrong.

What I expect is this: 2-expected.jpg
Left as before, but In the right pois for all swim inside including areas.

Hope I made it clearer
Jan

> Am 21.02.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk <mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>>:
> 
> Hi Jan
> 
> I'm slightly confused as to what you are trying to do here when you say
> it works for nodes but not polygons.
> 
> After you've output a POI from the first rule what are you trying to
> do?
> 
> Ticker
> 
> On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:42 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
>> Hi Gerd,
>> 
>> my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
>> 
>> This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
>> 	leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
>> 	sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
>> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
>> 
>> It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium is
>> given.
>> Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for
>> stadium and swimming as a combination only.
>> I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
>> 
>> Attached a small example.
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net <mailto:jan_m23 at gmx.net>>:
>>> 
>>> Hi Gerd,
>>> 
>>> so easy - that works!
>>> Thanks for helping me out
>>> Jan
>>> 
>>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann <
>>>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>> 
>>>> is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
>>>> should work.
>>>> 
>>>> Gerd
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im
>>>> Auftrag von jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net <mailto:jan_m23 at gmx.net>>
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
>>>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>>>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Joris,
>>>> 
>>>> thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
>>>> 
>>>> What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g. leisure=park
>>>> & sport=swimming.
>>>> I have a poi-rule for park&swimming first and further want to
>>>> exclude swimmings inside matching polygons.
>>>> 
>>>> Do I have another option to define the combination so that it can
>>>> be seen by is_in?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jan
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Joris Bo <jorisbo at hotmail.com <mailto:jorisbo at hotmail.com>>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jan
>>>>> 
>>>>> As far as i understood this function really checks the polygons
>>>>> around the poi to check if the poi-coordinates are located
>>>>> within the polygon specified.
>>>>> It can not check variables because they don't have an outline.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Joris Bo
>>>>> jorisbo at hotmail.com <mailto:jorisbo at hotmail.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>>>> Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> Namens
>>>>> jan meisters
>>>>> Verzonden: dinsdag 16 februari 2021 14:12
>>>>> Aan: Development list for mkgmap <
>>>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>
>>>>> Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I try to use is_in to fetch pois inside own invented tags,
>>>>> e.g.:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    leisure=park {add processed=yes} [0x2c06 resolution 24
>>>>> continue with_actions]
>>>>>    leisure=swimming_pool & is_in(processed,yes,in_or_on)=true
>>>>> {delete leisure}
>>>>> 
>>>>> This fails, however „is_in(leisure,park,in_or_on)=true“ works
>>>>> in the example.
>>>>> Could someone explain where I´m wrong?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20210221/388f8bed/attachment-0001.html>