logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Problems with sea in overview map

From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Wed May 19 11:46:05 BST 2021

Hi Gerd

I often see other polygons becoming self-intersecting at lower
resolutions (or at least GPSMapEdit does). If the DP filter is doing
this then maybe this should be tacked first, with an alternate version
for polygons - I have no idea how this would be implemented.

Should shapeMergeFilter somehow consider each polygon as if its points
are rounded to resolution, with adjacent duplicates removed. This
should allow more merging and will be much less likely to be inhibited
by the 256 point limit. Doing this, small holes/islands are likely to
disappear.

I don't like the idea of trying to delay hole cutting per resolution,
and I don't see quite how it would work for pre-comp-sea

Ticker

On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 07:06 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've identified a few problems with the handling of natural=sea in
> areas with lots of islands, e.g. coast of Norway. Thouands of rather
> small polygons are created, esp. when also natual=land is rendered. 
> 1. Typical tiles are rather large, they span several precompiled sea
> tiles if --precomp-sea=sea.zip is used. As of now, the polygons from
> different sea-tiles are never merged. This might be improved to
> reduce file size and possibly also improve rendering
> 2. Even at resolution 12 the curent code distributes the thousands of
> tiles into multiple sub divisions before ShapeMerger is executed for
> each subdiv. Shapes (polygons) are only merged when the number of
> points for one shape stays inside the IMG limit of 256 points, so the
> merger cannot do much.
> 3. Douglas-Peucker (DP) filter is used for the merged shapes which
> contain holes. This gives weird results because the invisible lines
> which connect the holes are causing heavy self-intersections at low
> resolutions. I think this is one reason for white triangles in the
> sea.
> 
> I am experimenting with these ideas:
> - At low resolutions the ShapeMerger could merge more so that shapes
> with more than > 256 points are produced, assuming that DP filter
> will remove many of them. Not sure if this works with shapes that
> have holes.
> - At low resolutions it is likely/wanted that small islands
> disappear, so we should remove those first, together with the lines
> that connect them with the outer ring.
> - The simplified sea polygons without holes should be merged as much
> as possible before using any filter, maybe DP should be executed
> first on the merged shapes so that fever subdivs are created.
> 
> Each method has its own effects and I'm searching for the best
> combination and order. 
> 
> A lot of this is only possible because we now have Tickers code that
> allows multipolygon splitting without using
> java.awt.geom.Area.intersect() . Tickers code in ShapeSplitter seems
> to be able to handle the holes properly. 
> 
> Gerd
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list