[mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Sat Jun 12 08:34:15 BST 2021
highlighted = pink. maybe that confused you. I should have explained better. But in general ll those gaps should not be there. On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 10:31, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> wrote: > I use > C:\openmtbmap\osmconvert.exe --drop-author --drop-version > D:\openmtbmap\osmpbf_geofabrik\australia-oceania-latest.osm.pbf > -o=C:\openmtbmap\osmpbf_geofabrik\australia-oceania.o5m > then > start /low /b /wait java -XX:+AggressiveHeap -Xms15000m -Xmx54000m -jar > C:\openmtbmap\splitter.jar "--precomp-sea=C:\openmtbmap\maps\sea.zip" > --max-nodes=1000000 --max-threads=8 --output=pbf "--keep-complete" > --route-rel-values=mtb,bicycle,foot,hiking --max-areas=4000 > --geonames-file=C:\OpenMTBMap\maps\cities5000.zip > --description=australia-oceania --mapid=65340000 > C:\openmtbmap\osmpbf_geofabrik\australia-oceania.o5m > > > The highlighted tiles selected in Mapsource for sending to GPS device - > are empty using improve-overview - but they are filled with sea without > using it. They are only empty in overview map. I think those gaps also > should not be there - so it is a wider problem that existed before already. > For overview map mkgmap should use all the sea/land area for the full > coverage - and not cut out areas. Actually cutting for sea/land should also > not happen in the normal map. The reason for trimming is to have to maps > not overlap itself with empty content - because mkgmap/splitter only cuts > rectangles - not polygons. But sea/land will be identical in two country > maps - so should not be trimmed > > On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 10:24, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> the problem is - using improve-overview some tiles in the overview map >> miss sea. I am pretty sure this happens on default style too. But likely >> not if you use --no-trim and / or keep-complete for splitting. >> Attached is the areas.list >> >> On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 09:40, Gerd Petermann < >> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Felix, >>> >>> I don't yet understand what's going on. Please provide a link to your >>> areas.list >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von >>> Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juni 2021 12:14 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> Nope - that did not help. And I think the problem is a bit unrelated. >>> Mkgmap with your new version and --improve-overview assumes there is an >>> empty map - and puts those three square areas of missing anything. Maybe >>> you give it a try and analyse what happens. >>> >>> I actually think this bug has been there before already - and it >>> happened to me with contourlines only maps. Meaning mkgmap cuts the map >>> area way too aggressively, and removes part of the map that actually even >>> have content - or was it splitter. I think for contourlines only maps I had >>> to use splitter with --keep-complete and --no-trim else there would be >>> missing. areas in the map. (not on the outside but right in the middle in >>> the ocean usually - but sometimes also e.g. northernmost parts of Norway in >>> an Europe contourlines only map). >>> >>> So I split australia-oceania WITHOUT --no-trim. Are you assuming to >>> split with --no-trim? Actually those grey boxes are each of its own >>> separate tiles (with nearly no content - e.g. one has a riff polygon only). >>> I guess there is lots of openseamap stuff so splitter creates those tiny >>> tiles... >>> Mkgmap should never trip on the overview map. The normal map should be >>> trimmed aggressively - as we still cannot cut according to a bounding >>> polygon and only using rectangles. But the overview map sea creation should >>> not cut out sea or anything. >>> >>> I guess you never noticed that working on Norway - but it would be a >>> good start to play around with australia-oceania (it is nice to work with - >>> because it is relatively small in size so compiles fast). See attached >>> screenshot of overview map. All the selected tiles were before showing sea >>> (and do so once past the overview map too). The high DP filter was not the >>> problem. For Australia-Oceania the --improve-overview right now is not a >>> good example. The map was better before. Oh yeah - and >>> --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 23:14, 22:14, 21:20, 20:20, 19:20, 18:20, >>> 17:20, 16:20, 15:20, 14:20, 13:20, 12:20, 11:20, 10:20 >>> looks better than small values. Actually I think even to rather increase >>> more. Maybe that is why I had less problems right from the start - because >>> I cut away tiny islands. >>> >>> C:\openmtbmap\maps>if yes NEQ no start /low /b /wait java -jar >>> -XX:+AggressiveHeap -XX:StringTableSize=1000003 -Xms15000M -Xmx29000M >>> C:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --order-by-decreasing-area >>> "--generate-sea" --code-page=1252 >>> "--precomp-sea=C:\openmtbmap\maps\sea.zip" >>> "--style-file=C:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --improve-overview >>> --add-boundary-nodes-at-admin-boundaries --drive-on=detect >>> --allow-reverse-merge >>> --line-types-with-direction=0x18,0x1f,0x10016,0x10101,0x10105,0x10401,0x10403,0x10405,0x10408,0x10409,0x1040b,0x1040d,0x1040e,0x10500,0x10501,0x10502,0x10503,0x10504,0x10505,0x10506,0x10507,0x10607,0x10609,0x1060b,0x10702,0x10703,0x10704,0x10705,0x10706,0x10707,0x10a00,0x10a02,0x10a04,0x10a05,0x10e1e,0x10e0f,0x10e0e,0x10e1e,0x10f0a,0x10f1c,0x10e1d >>> --nsis --index --levels="0:24, 1:23, 2:22, 3:21, 4:20, 5:19, 6:18" >>> --overview-levels="7:17, 8:16, 9:15, 10:14, 11:13, 12:12" >>> --add-pois-to-areas >>> --pois-to-areas-placement=entrance=main;entrance=yes;building=entrance;barrier= >>> entrance >>> --x-simplify-filter-line-errors=23:2.6,22:4.2,21:5.4,20:6,19:7,18:7.5,17:6,14:6 >>> --x-simplify-filter-polygon-errors=23:3.6,22:7,21:6,20:9,17:2.6 >>> --add-boundary-nodes-at-admin-boundaries=2 >>> --poi-excl-index=0x6405,0x4316,0x2f00 >>> --copyright-file="C:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_svn\copyrightopm.txt" >>> --license-file="C:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_svn\licenseopm.txt" --cycle-map >>> --ignore-fixme-values --housenumbers >>> --road-name-config=C:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_svn\roadNameConfig.txt >>> --split-name-index --link-pois-to-ways --ignore-turn-restrictions >>> --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 23:14, 22:14, 21:20, 20:20, 19:20, 18:20, >>> 17:20, 16:20, 15:20, 14:20, 13:20, 12:20, 11:20, 10:20" >>> --description=omtb_auo --show-profiles=1 >>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest >>> --bounds=C:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds.zip >>> --mdr7-del=pri;sec;ter;cw;min;unsf,uncl;living;pdstrn;trk;pth;ft;fp;brdlw;rd;byw;ser;cw;mrt;crt;Bklane;Bktrk;opp;Opptrk;g0;g1;g2;g3;g4;g5;g6;t1;t2;t3;t4;t5;t6;xbk;cr;mr;hr;mr0;mr1;mr2;mr3;mr4;mr5;mr0.;mr1 >>> .;mr2.;mr3.;mr4.;mr5.;mr6.;mr00;mr01;mr02;mr03;mr04;mr05;mr06;mr11;mr12;mr13;mr14;mr15;mr16;mr20;mr21;mr22;mr23;mr24;mr25;mr26;mr30;mr31;mr32;mr33;mr34;mr35;mr35;mr40;mr41;mr41;mr43;mr44;mr45;mr46;mr50;mr51;mr52;mr53;mr54;mr55;mr56;mr60;mr61;mr62;mr63;mr64;mr65;mr66;m0;m1;m2;m3;m4;m5;m0.;m1.;m2.;m3.;m4.;m5.;m6.;m00;m01;m02;m03;m04;m05;m06;m11;m12;m13;m14;m15;m16;m20;m21;m22;m23;m24;m25;m26;m30;m31;m32;m33;m34;m35;m35;m40;m41;m41;m43;m44;m45;m46;m50;m51;m52;m53;m54;m55;m56;m60;m61;m62;m63;m64;m65;m66;mr.0;mr.1;mr.2;mr.3;mr.4;mr.5;mr.6;m.0;m.1;m.2;m.3;m.4;m.5;m.6;m1.;m2.;m3.;m4.;m5.;m6.;lmr;mrx0;mrx1;mrx2;mrx3;mrx4;mrx5;mrx6;mx0;mx1;mx2;mx3;mx4;mx5;mx6;bridge;swing;aqueduct;viaduct;"ntnl >>> bndry";admin_lv=4;"ntnl >>> park";weir;dam;waterfall;rapids;stream;river;drain;ditch;"huge >>> river";"hugest river";"medium river";"small river";"wide river";"hugest >>> canal";"huge canal";"medium canal";"small canal";"big >>> canal";canal;snowpark;Skitour-descent;Skipiste;Skislope;illuminated;Nordic-Skiing;skitour >>> ;platter;ropetow;tbar;chairlift;goods_lift;runway;taxiway;apron;VFS0;VFS1;VFS2;VFS3;VFS4;VFS5;VFS6;VFS7;usf;cstrn;steps;parking_aisle;res;cob;cobstn;public_footway;public_footpath >>> --mdr7-excl=pri;sec;ter;cw;min;unsf,uncl;pdstrn;trk;pth;ft;fp;brdlw;rd;byw;ser;cw;mrt;crt;Bklane;Bktrk;opp;Opptrk;g0;g1;g2;g3;g4;g5;g6;t1;t2;t3;t4;t5;t6;xbk;cr;mr;hr;mr0;mr1;mr2;mr3;mr4;mr5;mr0.;mr1.;mr2.;mr3.;mr4.;mr5.;mr6.;mr00;mr01;mr02;mr03;mr04;mr05;mr06;mr11;mr12;mr13;mr14;mr15;mr16;mr20;mr21;mr22;mr23;mr24;mr25;mr26;mr30;mr31;mr32;mr33;mr34;mr35;mr35;mr40;mr41;mr41;mr43;mr44;mr45;mr46;mr50;mr51;mr52;mr53;mr54;mr55;mr56;mr60;mr61;mr62;mr63;mr64;mr65;mr66;m0;m1;m2;m3;m4;m5;m0.;m1.;m2.;m3.;m4.;m5.;m6.;m00;m01;m02;m03;m04;m05;m06;m11;m12;m13;m14;m15;m16;m20;m21;m22;m23;m24;m25;m26;m30;m31;m32;m33;m34;m35;m35;m40;m41;m41;m43;m44;m45;m46;m50;m51;m52;m53;m54;m55;m56;m60;m61;m62;m63;m64;m65;m66;mr.0;mr.1;mr.2;mr.3;mr.4;mr.5;mr.6;m.0;m.1;m.2;m.3;m.4;m.5;m.6;m1.;m2.;m3.;m4.;m5.;m6.;lmr;mrx0;mrx1;mrx2;mrx3;mrx >>> 4;mrx5;mrx6;mx0;mx1;mx2;mx3;mx4;mx5;mx6;"ntnl bndry";admin_lv=4;"ntnl >>> park";"huge river";"hugest river";"medium river";"small river";"wide >>> river";"hugest canal";"huge canal";"medium canal";"small canal";"big >>> canal";canal;snowpark;Skitour-descent;illuminated;Nordic-Skiing;skitour;platter;ropetow;tbar;goods_lift;runway;taxiway;apron;VFS0;VFS1;VFS2;VFS3;VFS4;VFS5;VFS6;VFS7;usf;cstrn;steps;parking_aisle;res;cob;cobstn;public_footway;public_footpath >>> --route --country-abbr=auo --country-name=australia-oceania >>> --mapname=65340000 --family-id=6534 --product-id=1 >>> --series-name=omtb_australia-oceania_11.06.2021 >>> --family-name=mtb_auo_11.06.2021 --tdbfile --gmapi >>> --overview-mapname=mapsetc --keep-going >>> --area-name="australia-oceania_11.06.2021_omtb" -c >>> D:\openmtbmap\maps\template.australia-oceania >>> C:\OpenMTBMap\contourlines20\australia-oceania\7*.img typauo.TYP >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 12:25, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com >>> <mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> yes I was using: >>> >>> --x-simplify-filter-line-errors=23:2.6,22:4.2,21:5.4,20:6,19:7,18:7.5,16:8,14:9 >>> --x-simplify-filter-polygon-errors=23:3.6,22:7,21:6,20:9 >>> --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 23:14, 22:14, 21:20, 20:20, 19:20, 18:20, >>> 17:20, 16:20, 15:20, 14:20, 13:20, 12:20, 11:20, 10:20" >>> >>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:21, 3:20, 4:19, 5:18 >>> overview-levels = 6:17, 7:16, 8:15, 9:14, 10:13 >>> >>> As this only affects the overview map - I guess I should change it to: >>> --x-simplify-filter-polygon-errors=23:3.6,22:7,21:6,20:9,17:2.6 ?? >>> >>> The polygon-size-limits should not matter as I have the skip-size filter >>> set for sea. >>> >>> I had worked quite a long time to optimize those settings with the old >>> behaviour. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 11:50, Gerd Petermann < >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> Hi Felix, >>> >>> Maybe you are using large values for the Douglas-Peucker filter at low >>> resolutions? That's probably a bad idea with the new option. I always >>> tested with the default 2.6 for all levels. >>> The effect of the new option is that DP really can do its work. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann < >>> extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>> >>> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juni 2021 10:23 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> --generate-sea --precomp-sea=C:\openmtbmap\maps\sea.zip >>> --order-by-decreasing-area --allow-reverse-merge >>> I thought using precomp-sea is fine (I did not update the precomp-sea in >>> between) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 11:10, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com >>> <mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto: >>> extremecarver at gmail.com>>> wrote: >>> compilation time includes splitting, and some other stuff. Loads of >>> countries (9:34 / 9:21 (sorry dumb error 9:19) for all european single >>> countries and a few continents (but not Europe continent) in hours. >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 11:08, Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com >>> <mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto: >>> extremecarver at gmail.com>>> wrote: >>> I just compiled the australia-oceania map with that option, and I think >>> I must be missing something. It got substantially worse (it is identical >>> until the overview map kicks in) - then I get some huge squares of sea >>> missing. Compile time for all maps until that point before >>> Compilation time is not up a lot: >>> 0:12 - 9:46 = 9:34 >>> one week before (except older mapdata no changes in compilation >>> procedure and older mkgmap) 20:17 - 5:38 = 9:19 >>> >>> Anything I could be missing? I use the newest low-res branch build and >>> added --improve-overview to the compilation process. >>> >>> in my polygons file I have: >>> natural=sea { add mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true; set mkgmap:drawLevel=2 } >>> [0x10f1d resolution 10] >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 07:12, Gerd Petermann < >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I hoped for some positive feedback on this but got none so far. Did I >>> miss something important? >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann >>> <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. Juni 2021 21:05 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> Hi Felix, >>> >>> the map contained was without routing or index, so for a normal map the >>> difference should be even smaller. >>> There is no need to change sea.zip. You just have to use >>> --improve-overview for now. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann >>> <extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: >>> extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. Juni 2021 21:02 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> I guess that is a time for a full Norway map based on default style - so >>> that is quite okay. Not a sea only Norway map... Well I hope that Thorsten >>> Kukuk can adapt his sea files in the near future then... >>> >>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 19:37, Gerd Petermann < >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>> >>> wrote: >>> OK, I think found a good solution. Speed is quite OK, I see 9 min 48 >>> secs for map of norway and instead of 8 min 44 secs with r4756, and I >>> consider Norway to be a worst case. >>> >>> See >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4761 >>> for the details. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> im Auftrag von Gerd >>> Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com >>> ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: >>> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. Juni 2021 12:11 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> With the provided patch the speed is very poor for areas like Norway, >>> probably twice the time. >>> It is much slower because it does the complex multipolygon cutting for >>> each level in the overview map. Probably too slow for complex coastal areas. >>> This time will be the same for precomp-sea unless we can store sea >>> polygons for each resolution. >>> >>> Performance will be no problem if I find a way to use Douglas-Peucker or >>> similar before cutting. That was my original idea but DP produces self >>> intersecting polygons and the MultipolygonCutter cannot cope with that. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> im Auftrag von Felix >>> Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com >>> ><mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com >>> >><mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com >>> ><mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>>> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. Juni 2021 11:55 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map >>> >>> Is it only much slower because of not using precomp sea? Or will it be >>> much slower in general? And what is much slower for say Europe continent >>> map? If a modern 4core/8thread processor needs 30 minutes more I would >>> prefer the old way knowing it is worse (if the time difference is >>> negligible with precomp-sea then that would be great). >>> >>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk >>> <mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>>><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk><mailto:rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk<mailto: >>> rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk>>>>> wrote: >>> Hi Gerd >>> >>> This is going to take some studying to work out the implications. Can't >>> do much for the next few days however, but will look carefully at the >>> end of the week. >>> >>> Ticker >>> >>> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 14:02 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > the attached patch improves the overview map, but so far only when >>> > precomp-sea is NOT used. >>> > I tested it with --generate-sea=multipolygon,floodblocker so that >>> > mkgmap really has a multipolygon with the natual=sea data. >>> > >>> > For each level in the overview map it uses the original multipolygon >>> > data to compute the rings which will might visible at the given >>> > resolution. This requires more time compared to the current code but >>> > the result is much better and some fine tuning is possible. >>> > >>> > To be able to use this also with --precomp-sea we need some changes >>> > in the code which generates sea.zip so that one multipolygon relation >>> > for each tile is stored. >>> > >>> > I've uploaded the results here: >>> > https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/511/compare.7z >>> > What do you think? >>> > >>> > Gerd >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> >>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> >>> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> >>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >>> >> >> >> -- >> Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org >> >> > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > -- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20210612/05cd4e36/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Proof of concept for better sea in overview map
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list