[mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Thu Jul 1 12:15:47 BST 2021
Hi Gerd attached the files concerning south-america On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 11:26, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Felix, > > the poly file for South America contains few points (< 40). I think > splitter switched into the mode which tries hard to fit tiles into the > polygon. > If you post a link to the corresponding densities-out.txt and log I can > tell you more details. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von > Felix Hartmann <extremecarver at gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Juli 2021 09:58 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released > > Well here are the results for 615: > If you would like the log files for any of those runs - tell me. > Significantly better with polygon file are Norway, Russia, > Australia-Oceania and Asia. This version has much less problem countries > like 614. It would be too big to attach all of them here. If you like all > of them then I can upload them to my server. > > South America is really bad using polygon-file. > > "for netherlands use polygon-file - cnt1 = 89 cnt0 = 88" > "for great-britain use polygon-file - cnt1 = 111 cnt0 = 110" > "for germany use polygon-file - cnt1 = 258 cnt0 = 257" > "for liechtenstein do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 6" > "for monaco do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 2" > "for slovenia do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 27 cnt0 = 28" > "for ukraine use polygon-file - cnt1 = 62 cnt0 = 61" > "for norway use polygon-file - cnt1 = 129 cnt0 = 119" > "for switzerland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 29 cnt0 = 30" > "for poland use polygon-file - cnt1 = 132 cnt0 = 128" > "for sweden use polygon-file - cnt1 = 60 cnt0 = 54" > "for finland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 65 cnt0 = 84" > "for denmark use polygon-file - cnt1 = 33 cnt0 = 32" > "for andorra do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 4" > "for estonia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 9 cnt0 = 8" > "for saarland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 4 cnt0 = 17" > "for hamburg do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 12" > "for hessen do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 17 cnt0 = 18" > "for bayern do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 47 cnt0 = 48" > "for berlin do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 5 cnt0 = 13" > "for australia-oceania use polygon-file - cnt1 = 131 cnt0 = 109" > "for south-america do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 334 cnt0 = 463" > "for africa use polygon-file - cnt1 = 665 cnt0 = 663" > "for asia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1592 cnt0 = 1549" > "for russia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 426 cnt0 = 408" > "for central-america use polygon-file - cnt1 = 61 cnt0 = 58" > "for morocco do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 19 cnt0 = 27" > "for tanzania use polygon-file - cnt1 = 75 cnt0 = 74" > "for mozambique use polygon-file - cnt1 = 24 cnt0 = 23" > "for azerbaijan do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 4" > "for iran use polygon-file - cnt1 = 16 cnt0 = 15" > "for malaysia-singapore-brunei do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 16 cnt0 = > 17" > "for china use polygon-file - cnt1 = 106 cnt0 = 101" > "for india do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 109 cnt0 = 112" > "for indonesia do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 191 cnt0 = 200" > "for philippines use polygon-file - cnt1 = 52 cnt0 = 51" > "for afghanistan do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 11 cnt0 = 20" > "for australia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 67 cnt0 = 66" > "for argentina use polygon-file - cnt1 = 32 cnt0 = 27" > "for brazil use polygon-file - cnt1 = 177 cnt0 = 172" > "for chile do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 31 cnt0 = 33" > "for paraguay use polygon-file - cnt1 = 17 cnt0 = 16" > "for canada use polygon-file - cnt1 = 274 cnt0 = 272" > "for us-northeast do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 109 cnt0 = 110" > "for us-pacific use polygon-file - cnt1 = 21 cnt0 = 18" > "for us-south use polygon-file - cnt1 = 262 cnt0 = 261" > "for us-west use polygon-file - cnt1 = 229 cnt0 = 227" > "for greenland use polygon-file - cnt1 = 4 cnt0 = 2" > "for mexico use polygon-file - cnt1 = 44 cnt0 = 42" > "for reunion do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 5" > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Gerd Petermann < > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>> > wrote: > Hi Felix, > > I've released r615 to fix the problems with Saarland (now 17 tiles with > polygon instead of crash, 4 tiles without) and Norway (121 with polygon, > 128 without) > Numbers for max-nodes=1400000 > > Gerd > > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann < > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 10:52 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released > > well yeah by now my list is down to very few countries (different then > with older splitter.jar) that profit from --polygon-file. > I feel like I will only use polygon-file for Asia continent map and for > Russia - they fit your description of spanning over 180° and needing > polygon-file to be split into less tiles. They pretty consistently split > better with polygon-file on several splitter versions. > > Then maybe retest a year later. > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 11:25, Gerd Petermann < > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>> wrote: > Hi Felix, > > sure, it's not good if splitter fails to split correct data. Still, an > automated process should check the return code of the program. If splitter > returns a values != 0 you can be sure that something is wrong (same with > mkgmap) > > It's okay to split small files like Liechtenstein, no problem with that. > Just don't expect to always get fewer tiles when you use a polygon-file ;) > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann < > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 10:10 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released > > yes my script only counts the produced tiles. And if it's 0 that's very > bad for any automated process. 0 should only happen if the input data is > broken (yes then it should happen). > (and why do I split countries like Liechtenstein - well first I do not > know if the extract would fit into one tile without splitting, second if > the download is broken for some reason - then splitter rightfully cannot > split it - and the old maps on the server will not be overwritten by maps > based on a broken extract from geofabrik). > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 11:03, Gerd Petermann < > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>> > wrote: > Hi Felix, > > I can now reproduce the poor result with norway when I use both > --polygon-file and --precomp-sea. > Problem seems to be that splitter decides to try the slower algo first. > After a while it gives up and tries the alternative faster algo and that > would find a good solution soon but splitter gives up too early, so this is > really not an improvement. > Without the polygon the slower algo finds a good solution. > > I am working on a new solution which executes both algos in parallel and > selects the better result. This works much better for this test case but > sometimes worse when option --num-tiles is used. > > reg. Saarland with polygon: r614 stops with an error message (and returns > 1 to signal a bad split). Your scripts seems to ignore this and just counts > the number of written tiles? > I'll try to find a fix so that splitter doesn't try to fit the tiles into > the polygon when this happens... > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann < > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 08:55 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released > > okay yeah I think I misunderstood the polygon-file a bit. But why is the > split for Norway so much worse now? Before it was possible to get it down > to 115 tiles (using the polygon-file option) now its 168 instead. Not using > polygon-file no change. (guess the 1 tile more is maybe added data > somewhere). > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 07:59, Gerd Petermann < > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > >>><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>>> wrote: > Hi Felix, > > reg. Saarland: I'll try to reproduce. Looks like an error. > reg. Liechtenstein: > I think we still have different ideas what the polygon-file option is > about. > The documentation is a bit outdated since r433 (see > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=splitter&rev=433 ) > but the basic idea was that splitter should try to produce tiles which > don't overlap the given polygon too much. This sometimes means that it > produces more and smaller tiles. > Splitter should be able to find good splits for geofabrik downloads > without a polygon-file, but there are use cases: If the user only wants a > part of a download in the map they can use the corresponding polygon. > > You seem to suggest that splitter should just use the polygon to be able > to ignore data that is in the input file but not in the polygon and never > try to fit the tiles into the polygon? > > Gerd > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann > <extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com><mailto: > extremecarver at gmail.com<mailto:extremecarver at gmail.com>>>>> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juni 2021 23:04 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released > > I found (server) time to run my test again - using splitter v614 - search > limit 1000000 > Problem cases in bold. I also added the number of tiles that splitter v602 > needed (well on one week older geofabrik extract - but that should not make > such a difference for Norway or South America). I feel 602 with > search-limit 1000000 was producing more consistent results. > > "for netherlands use polygon-file - cnt1 = 93 cnt0 = 88" > "for alps do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 225 cnt0 = 226" > "for liechtenstein do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 6" > I thought that the new version fixes the splitting if it is not actually > needed. > > "for monaco do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 2" > "for slovenia do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 27 cnt0 = 28" > "for ukraine use polygon-file - cnt1 = 62 cnt0 = 61" > "for norway do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 129 cnt0 = 168" > Big degradation here - with the older splitter it was: "for norway use > polygon-file - cnt1 = 128 cnt0 = 115" (also using 1000000 search limit) > > "for switzerland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 29 cnt0 = 30" > "for poland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 127 cnt0 = 128" > "for sweden use polygon-file - cnt1 = 60 cnt0 = 54" > "for finland do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 65 cnt0 = 84" > "for czech-republic use polygon-file - cnt1 = 63 cnt0 = 62" > "for denmark use polygon-file - cnt1 = 33 cnt0 = 32" > "for austria use polygon-file - cnt1 = 56 cnt0 = 54" > "for andorra do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1 cnt0 = 4" > "for estonia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 9 cnt0 = 8" > "for saarland use polygon-file - cnt1 = 4 cnt0 = 0" > Seems using a polygon-file no spit at all - however it should still write > the data again out into the newly defined filename. > > "for hamburg do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 12" > "for hessen do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 17 cnt0 = 18" > "for bayern do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 47 cnt0 = 48" > "for berlin do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 5 cnt0 = 13" > "for australia-oceania use polygon-file - cnt1 = 112 cnt0 = 109" > "for south-america do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 335 cnt0 = 463" > old splitter "for south-america do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 337 cnt0 > = 339" (using default search limit) > > "for africa do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 653 cnt0 = 663" > "for asia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 1697 cnt0 = 1549" > "for russia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 429 cnt0 = 408" > 0ld identical > > "for central-america use polygon-file - cnt1 = 60 cnt0 = 58" > "for antarctica use polygon-file - cnt1 = 7 cnt0 = 6" > "for morocco do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 19 cnt0 = 27" > old identical > > "for congo-democratic-republic do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 37 cnt0 = > 38" > "for mozambique use polygon-file - cnt1 = 24 cnt0 = 23" > "for azerbaijan do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 4" > "for malaysia-singapore-brunei do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 16 cnt0 = > 17" > "for china use polygon-file - cnt1 = 104 cnt0 = 101" > "for india do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 109 cnt0 = 112" > "for indonesia do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 175 cnt0 = 200" > "for japan use polygon-file - cnt1 = 163 cnt0 = 160" > "for philippines do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 50 cnt0 = 51" > "for afghanistan do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 11 cnt0 = 20" > old identical > > "for australia use polygon-file - cnt1 = 67 cnt0 = 66" > "for argentina use polygon-file - cnt1 = 31 cnt0 = 27" > "for brazil use polygon-file - cnt1 = 176 cnt0 = 172" > "for chile do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 31 cnt0 = 33" > "for paraguay use polygon-file - cnt1 = 17 cnt0 = 16" > "for us-midwest do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 152 cnt0 = 154" > "for us-northeast do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 109 cnt0 = 110" > "for us-pacific use polygon-file - cnt1 = 20 cnt0 = 18" > "for us-south do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 259 cnt0 = 261" > "for us-west do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 224 cnt0 = 227" > "for greenland use polygon-file - cnt1 = 4 cnt0 = 2" > "for mexico use polygon-file - cnt1 = 43 cnt0 = 42" > "for reunion do not use polygon-file - cnt1 = 3 cnt0 = 5" > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 16:51, Gerd Petermann < > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > >>><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > >><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>><mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > ><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>><mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com > <mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com><mailto: > GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com<mailto:GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>>>>>> > wrote: > Hi all, > > I think with r609 there should be no need to use a polygon file. See > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=splitter&rev=609 > > Please let me know when this version produces much worse results compared > to older releases (using the same options and input) and provide the files > densities-out.txt and the log. > > If you are interested in good splits you should check the splitter log for > "Solution is not nice. Can't find a better solution" > > When this is printed splitter did not find a good split. Expect almost > empty tiles in this case. > It is likely that this happens when rather small files are split with a > polygon and the default resolution. Normal users don't do this, but some > map providers try to use the same options for very different downloads ... > > Gerd > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > >>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > >><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>>> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > >>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > <mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk><mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > ><mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto: > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > -- > Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20210701/e60dc7cb/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: splitter_log.7z Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1518537 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20210701/e60dc7cb/attachment-0001.obj>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r609 released
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit r4800: improve unit test
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list