[mkgmap-dev] Small problem with global index
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Tue Nov 23 13:37:54 GMT 2021
Hi Gerd Here are the bits I used to investigate case strangeness The 2 tiles can be extracted from Hampshire, England, Great-Britain etc with the attached split-list. I can upload them if you want The style is "default" with additions at end of points & lines to rename "Upton" to "wherWell" and a slight mod to inc/address - diff attached. Command is: $ java -ea -jar ../mkgmap-r4810/mkgmap.jar --add-pois-to-areas \ --bounds=../bounds.zip --code-page=1252 --gmapi --gmapsupp --index \ --location-autofill=is_in,nearest --lower-case \ --preserve-element-order --route --style-file=tstStyle -c template.args --route was needed for Find > Address to show in MapSource and to work in BaseCamp. Resultant behaviour from Find > Address: BaseCamp 4.7.4. City field allows "Wherwell" or "wherwell" (NB not "wherWell"), Streets in either city can be found regardless of which version is entered, but if the street is in the top tile the city is shown as "Wherwell" (even if in "wherwell"=="Upton"). City for Streets in the lower tile show as "wherwell". MapSource 6.16.3 The Street must be chosen first. Only "wherwell" is accepted in the City field. The results show "Wherwell"/"wherwell" according to the tile, as above. eTrex HCx The City field can be set to "Wherwell" or "wherWell". If "Wherwell" then can find streets in the top tile, if "wherWell" then the bottom tile. Sample Streets: Name In HCx find>city necessary Alma Lane Upton wherWell Baybridge Lane Upton Wherwell Beech Grove Wherwell Wherwell Belmore Upton Wherwell Chant Close Wherwell Wherwell Bigpath Lane Upton Either as crosses tile Church Street Both Either, finds expected one Ticker On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 11:03 +0000, Ticker Berkin wrote: > Hi Gerd > > I'm not ignoring this, but trying to put the essence of my renames > into > the default style and testing with a r4810 and --lower-case I find > MapSource isn't giving me a Find > Address option and BaseCamp > doesn't > find any streets and once said "Doesn't support Address Search" > > So I'll try and pin down what makes it fail totally. > > Ticker > > On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 15:27 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > Hi Ticker, > > > > the results probably depend on the way how you "renamed a city". > > You > > may only rename a single POI or also the data in the bounds.zip or > > maybe also addr:city=Upton etc. > > That's why I keep asking for demo data to reproduce your results. > > Testing this stuff is quite complex and error prone and thus we > > should try to have common input files to be able to verify our > > results. > > > > Gerd > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: default.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 1679 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20211123/e47200c8/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- # make a single map from bit N of Winchester to Newport IOW #74210001: 2362592,-71808 to 2389984,-47168 #74210001 (50.69572448730469,-1.54083251953125) to (51.28349304199219,-1.012115478515625) #74210001: 2362592,-73088 to 2389984,-50304 # maybe, to do better testing, split into 2 maps 74210001: 2362592,-73088 to 2376288,-50304 74210002: 2376288,-73088 to 2389984,-50304
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Small problem with global index
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Small problem with global index
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list