[mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference

Sun May 29 15:51:38 BST 2022

Hi Gerd,

I just played with the routing prefs to see if I could change something ;-)

I´m using it like this: https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/557/OFM_default-BC_Mac.png <https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/557/OFM_default-BC_Mac.png>
And same here, checked toll-avoidance routes as preferred, unchecked over the primary.

Toll-avoidance should prefer bicycleroutes according to Minko.
I´ve unchecked long ago for some reason, don´t remember why and have to recompare.
But same as no path is routed there is no bicycleroute …

Jan

> Am 29.05.2022 um 16:17 schrieb Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>:
> 
> Hi jan,
> 
> maybe my routing profile for OFM bike is different?
> 
> Not sure what Minko recommends today. Mine says "Faster Time", Standard  Elevation Mode, only road type avoidance is for "Roll  Roads".
> When I remove the toll roads avoidance the route is different and follows the major road.
> 
> Gerd
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 16:07
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
> 
> Hi Gerd,
> 
> here OFM lite gives the same unwanted result as OFM full :-(
> 
> Jan
> 
>> Am 29.05.2022 um 14:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>:
>> 
>> Hi Jan,
>> 
>> the artifical way would be a highway=residential, not path. Anyhow, I tried to reproduce the different routing results with the mentioned change in the OFM lite style
>> but found no difference, the wanted route is calculated for both versions.
>> 
>> Gerd
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:10
>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>> 
>> Hi Jan,
>> 
>> not sure if you would find it with that id, since it would be an artificial way. Don't have time now, will look into this later.
>> 
>> Gerd
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net>
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:07
>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>> 
>> Hi Gerd,
>> 
>> do you mean another routable line?
>> All (routable) highways are echotagged in my style atm, but I can´t find 27463238 twice.
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 29.05.2022 um 09:16 schrieb Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jan,
>>> 
>>> might be the oneway:bicycle=no on way 27463238 which can create an additional path in the opposite direction.
>>> 
>>> Gerd
>>> 
>>> ________________________________________
>>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan meisters <jan_m23 at gmx.net>
>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Mai 2022 20:15
>>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>>> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I´m using an altered copy of the OFM style and therefore sometimes compare the results.
>>> One routing difference I found I was able to lead back, but the cause I don´t understand at all.
>>> 
>>> My test-route should prefer the small residential „Altengabengäßchen“ over the primary „Viktoriastrasse“.
>>> Latest OFM does, my version not since I removed {add bicycle=yes} from this line:
>>> highway=path & surface ~ '(paved|asphalt|sett|concrete|paving_stones|paving_stones:30)' & access!=no & access!=private & vehicle!=no { set highway=pedestrian; add bicycle=yes; add motorcar=yes; }
>>> 
>>> But unfortunately there is no path or pedestrian in the test-route, nor is it an option to use one.
>>> Anyone has an idea how this path>pedestrian rule could affect routing on residential/primary?
>>> Same happens when I replay the change with the original OFM.
>>> 
>>> Up-to-date osm.pbf, route from BC and screenshots are here: https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/556/test_route.zip
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Jan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20220529/118ca158/attachment.html>