[mkgmap-dev] Style Syntax for semi- or un-connected Lines
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Mon Mar 6 09:17:06 GMT 2023
Hi Felix Your syntax looks correct, but, given that the example WAY you quote is a private driveway, I'd suspect the settings of hgh:*, being set to meet these conditions for the way in question and the road and wall Ticker On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 22:35 +0100, Felix Herwegh wrote: > Hi, > I seem to have difficulties to figure out the correct lines syntax to > address semi- or un-connected lines. > Using > > > hgh:surface=Race & hgh:WayRel=yes & hgh:WayAcc != yes > > {set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none; > > set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none} > > > > [0x10e05 level 0] > still assigns 0x10e05 to roads like > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815829699, although this is the > only type definition assigning 0x10e05. Same for e. g. "set > mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x39" instead of "none". (Using Mkgmap > version 4896 atm) > Since documentation is quite sparse on this: Can somebody please help > me out? > Thanks, Felix > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20230306/6a3f2863/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Style Syntax for semi- or un-connected Lines
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Style Syntax for semi- or un-connected Lines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list