[mkgmap-dev] Error processing tile
From Ticker Berkin rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk on Sat Jun 3 10:27:54 BST 2023
Hi Gerd Our messages crossed. I'll investigate However SimpleRouteTest just checks on the sizes of TRE and RGN; likewise GmapsuppTest, but SimpleTest is more interesting. Ticker On Sat, 2023-06-03 at 09:09 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > Hi Ticker, > > thanks for the patch. Some unit tests need changes. Please check if > my changes are plausible. Something might be wrong on my system > because SimpleRouteTest failed also without your patch. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkgmap at jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Juni 2023 17:47 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Error processing tile > > Hi Gerd & Carlos > > I've found the problem and attach a patch which reduces the > Subdivision > line limit to 254. > > Subdivisions/areas have a set of limits, one of which was <= 255 > lines. > These lines can be of any type including roads. When --route, a > reference to each line/road part is created, but these are numbered > from 1, so the 255th line in a SubDivision is numbered 256 as a road > segment and this can't be represented as a byte in the NET > structures. > > It looks like this problem has always been there, but is most likely > to > manifest itself in areas with mostly roads. > > Ticker > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Error processing tile
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Error processing tile
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list