[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - styling for the power user
From Garvan & maew garvan.maew at online.com.kh on Sun Aug 9 10:24:24 BST 2009
Mark Burton wrote: > v2 > > now supports ~[0x??] syntax within name to specify highway shields > > to reduce the number of tags required, you can now specify all the > values in the mkgmap:gtype tag like this example: > > mkgmap:gtype="0x20,19,,1,2" > > type = 0x20 > minres = 19 > maxres not specified > roadclass = 1 > roadspeed = 2 > > The one tag per value scheme is still supported (for the moment at > least) > I tested this patch today, and it worked as advertised. Thanks for your work. I have a suggestion. Would it be better to use <tag k="mkgmap:gtype" v="0x06,21,,1,2"/> instead of <tag k="mkgmap:gtype=0x06,21,,1,2"/> I know nothing about osm format, other that what I observed, but the latter syntax looks the more obvious to me. If you try this (as I did until in my first try), you will get a NullPointerException. I think the long format , with seperate tags, is redundant. It's most likely that people using this syntax will be using a preprocessor of some kind, and I doubt if many preprocessors were written between version 1 and version 2 of your patch. Thanks Garvan
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - styling for the power user
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - styling for the power user
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list