[mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Allow ~ and friends at top level
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at googlemail.com on Sun Jan 17 15:11:51 GMT 2010
On 17.01.2010 11:20, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Thank you for testing my patch. In any case, I will try to figure out > what caused the size difference for me. Even if the patch does not seem > to bring much CPU-wise, the compact notation could be useful in some cases. > But as your example shows, the downside of the compactness would be extra > care needed when editing rules: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:18:07AM +0100, Felix Hartmann wrote: > >> I lost all of the following >> new: >> place ~ 'town\|suburb\village' [0x03 resolution 21] >> old: >> place=suburb | place=town | place=village [0x03 resolution 21] >> > It should be suburb\|village, not suburb\village. You should have got > points for place=town, but there probably were no place="suburb\village" > in the input. :-) (I don't even know what the \v would translate into > in this case. Probably just 'v', but it could be 0x0b (vertical tab) too. > Well however even without typo I'm still missing them!!!!! Using: /landuse ~ 'residential\|residental' [0x03 resolution 21] place ~ 'town\|suburb\|village\|hamlet' [0x03 resolution 21]/ There is absolutely no 0x03 in my map.... If I use instead /landuse=residential | landuse=residental [0x03 resolution 21] place=suburb | place=village | place=town [0x03 resolution 21]/ it renders fine. Something fundamentally fucks up in with your patch or there is again some typo that I made? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20100117/85b4cb21/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Allow ~ and friends at top level
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] Allow ~ and friends at top level
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list