logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] version numbers

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Nov 8 09:53:59 GMT 2012

Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with
mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a
windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now.

Gerd


n Willink wrote
> Thanks for your advise.
> 
> I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE
> ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR  etc of an img
> 
> As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number ,
> ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself.
> 
> By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of  maplevels &
> subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different
> versions of mkgmap
> 
> Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when
> the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I
> don’t need splitter.
> I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG
> 
> From: GerdP [via GIS] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM
> To: n Willink 
> Subject: Re: version numbers
> 
>> 
> 
>> There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at
>> present 
>> there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a
>> gmapsupp
>> or img - it could be included in the copyright section?
> 
> Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img
> file.
> Don't you?
> 
>> 
>> I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of
>> mkgmap
>> and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different.
> 
> What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the
> files, you 
> will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same
> input.
> My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but  one has to adapt it to
> current mkgmap releases. 
> See also
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html
> 
> Ciao,
> Gerd
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> mkgmap-dev mailing list 
> [hidden email] 
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html 
> To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email 

> ml-node+s19327n5324443h20 at .nabble

>  
> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
> NAML 
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list