[mkgmap-dev] version numbers

Thu Nov 8 10:04:00 GMT 2012

Thanks Gerd

I’ve not seen that I’m afraid even in the lbl

From: GerdP [via GIS] 
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM
To: n Willink 
Subject: Re: version numbers

Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. 

Gerd 

  n Willink wrote
  Thanks for your advise. 

  I’m looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR  etc of an img 

  As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps’s version number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. 

  By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of  maplevels & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm but different versions of mkgmap 

  Currently, I’m encountering some very strange & alarming behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in .This only happens when I don’t need splitter. 
  I’ve never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG 

  From: GerdP [via GIS] 
  Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM 
  To: n Willink 
  Subject: Re: version numbers 

  > 

  > There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty but at present 
  > there is no way of telling which version has been used to create a gmapsupp 
  > or img - it could be included in the copyright section? 

  Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in the *.img file. 
  Don't you? 

  > 
  > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different versions of mkgmap 
  > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different. 

  What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just compare the files, you 
  will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and the same input. 
  My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but  one has to adapt it to current mkgmap releases. 
  See also 
  http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html

  Ciao, 
  Gerd 

  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > -- 
  > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html
  > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 
  > _______________________________________________ 
  > mkgmap-dev mailing list 
  > [hidden email] 
  > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

  _______________________________________________ 
  mkgmap-dev mailing list 
  [hidden email] 
  http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev  

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: 
  http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html  
  To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email]  
  To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. 
  NAML 
  No virus found in this message. 
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html 
To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email ml-node+s19327n5324443h20 at n5.nabble.com 
To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here.
NAML 
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121108/d77efa34/attachment.html 