[mkgmap-dev] Routing and tunnels
From Charlie Ferrero charlie at cferrero.net on Tue Dec 11 17:45:00 GMT 2012
The type you've picked for tunnels (0x11501) is not routable. On 11 Dec 2012, at 21:24, "Geoff Sherlock" <geoffrey_sherlock at btinternet.com> wrote: > I decided I wanted to show bridges and tunnels on my maps; bridges were easy but I have trouble with tunnels. > > If I try the following as a catchall for all highways which are tunnels: > > highway=* & tunnel=yes [0x11501 road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 23] > > Or specifically for each type of highway e.g.: > > highway=cycleway & tunnel!=yes [0x10 road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 23] > . . . > . . . > highway=cycleway & tunnel=yes [0x11501 road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 23] > > The visual results are what I expect: you see the cycleway, then the tunnel, and then the cycleway again. But routing is broken and you are unable to route through the tunnel for any type of highway. > > If however I do the following: > > highway=* & tunnel=yes [0x11501 resolution 23 continue] > . . . > . . . > highway=cycleway [0x10 road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 23] > > I see both the tunnel and the cycleway, rather than just the tunnel, but at least I can route through the tunnel. > > So it seems if you have the test tunnel=yes it breaks routing. Is this expected behaviour? I am using R2328. > > Cheers, Geoff. > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121211/9304768e/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Routing and tunnels
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] US address considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list