[mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Fri Feb 8 11:39:47 GMT 2013
yes I'm still using that one. I think I can drop the --x , which I used because sometimes it was broken on the commandline check, but working below the hood. Never noticed any routing problems due to it. I probably don't have any time over the next 3 days though... Area to small to split, is not my aim. My aim is to make the map faster to draw on GPS. 6 is the highest value that leads to very small visible changes, therefore I use it over the default. On 08.02.2013 10:48, GerdP wrote: > oops, seems I was trapped by some caching in BaseCamp. > > --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6 doesn't break routing. > > Gerd > > > GerdP wrote >> Hi Felix, >> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote >>> Routing over long distances is not working at all anymore (much much >>> worse to before). >>> Don't have time (need to sleep) to find out if any roads become >>> unroutable though... >> please check: Are you still using this option? >> --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6 >> >> 1) It seems to be the reason for the broken routing (also in the trunk >> version) >> 2) althrough not documented, it is interpreted as >> --reduce-point-density-polygon=6 >> The help file for this option says that the recommended value is 8, but if >> the value is >> not specified, it uses the value from reduce-point-density. >> If both are not specified, the default for both is 2.6 >> >> I assume that you use the higher values because you see the >> severe "Area to small to split at ..." messages. Please ignore them >> as long as you don't see empty img files or try the >> MapArea_v1.patch >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Why-do-we-have-the-Area-too-small-to-split-at-message-tp5744612p5744766.html >> >> @Steve: >> I have no good idea why this option breaks routing over long distances. >> It just changes the way how DouglasPeucker works for shapes. >> The higher the value, the more points of shapes are removed. >> Maybe fewer shapes are written, maybe more sub divisions are empty. >> Any hints? >> >> Gerd > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-highwayCount-tp5748554p5748593.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list