[mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Thu Feb 28 14:17:58 GMT 2013
On 28/02/13 09:26, Gerd Petermann wrote: > just a question: Why are the rules into includes? Its just copying the previous base-style layout. > I thought this makes > only sense for rules that are > common to e.g. points and lines ? It makes sense in the same way that having a method that is only called from one place makes sense - it separates out common features and may make them easier to reuse in derived styles. In this actual case though, I don't think that there is much value in the current split since it is incomplete, so I am quite happy to in-line those again. ..Steve
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list