[mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Feb 28 14:40:06 GMT 2013
Hi Steve, I agree in all points. Gerd Steve Ratcliffe wrote > On 28/02/13 09:26, Gerd Petermann wrote: >> just a question: Why are the rules into includes? > > Its just copying the previous base-style layout. > > > I thought this makes >> only sense for rules that are >> common to e.g. points and lines ? > > It makes sense in the same way that having a method that is only > called from one place makes sense - it separates out common features > and may make them easier to reuse in derived styles. > > In this actual case though, I don't think that there is much value > in the current split since it is incomplete, so I am quite happy > to in-line those again. > > ..Steve > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Default-style-example-invalid-tp5751086p5751440.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list