logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Default style example invalid?

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Feb 28 14:40:06 GMT 2013

Hi Steve,

I agree in all points. 

Gerd


Steve Ratcliffe wrote
> On 28/02/13 09:26, Gerd Petermann wrote:
>> just a question: Why are the rules into includes?
> 
> Its just copying the previous base-style layout.
> 
>  >                                  I thought this makes
>> only sense for rules that are
>> common to e.g. points and lines ?
> 
> It makes sense in the same way that having a method that is only
> called from one place makes sense - it separates out common features
> and may make them easier to reuse in derived styles.
> 
> In this actual case though, I don't think that there is much value
> in the current split since it is incomplete, so I am quite happy
> to in-line those again.
> 
> ..Steve
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Default-style-example-invalid-tp5751086p5751440.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list