[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue May 7 11:34:14 BST 2013

Hi,

I've committed r2592 which fixes the issues with the wrong levels and uses
prefix ovm_ instead of suffix _ovm.

Gerd


Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> 6365????.img is somehow not the same as 6365*.img - even though I 
> deleted all other files beforehand that could match. I don't know 
> whether this is a windows fault, an mkgmap/java fault, or a combination 
> of mkgmap.jar on windows. Even if I use 2587 (so the old overview2 
> branch after merge with trunk, but before new changes) this bug happens, 
> and with ????.img I get Basecamp/Mapsource not opening the map, with 
> *.img they do open the map.
> 
> Clearly 6365????_ovm.img is therefore incompatible...
> That's my findings for today...
> 
> 
> On 06.05.2013 19:15, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>> Here is the second call:
>> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms4000M -Xmx10400M 
>> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1 
>> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea 
>> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index 
>> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=0 
>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest 
>> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at 
>> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365 
>> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_07.05.2013 
>> --family-name=mtbmap_at_07.05.2013 --tdbfile 
>> --overview-mapname=mapsetx --keep-going 
>> --area-name="austria_07.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" 6365????.img
>>
>> The ???? kinda works, but unlike when using 6365*.img, mkgmap doesn't 
>> completly put the content of the ovm_*.img into the overview map. 
>> Seems like only from one tile, the ovm_ is read, and from the other 
>> ones not taken into account. When using 6365*.img, the overviewmap has 
>> the correct complete content, however the addition of the ovm_*.img as 
>> real maptiles crashes Basecamp/Mapsource too. So currently on the 
>> second call - the overview map is not created correctly (besides the 
>> levels problem reported in another strung of this thread).
>>
>>
>> Overall I must say I'm quite impressed. The step to a real overview 
>> map seems nearly finished... (well routable overview map aside, but 
>> besides Garmin no-one managed to produce one so far AFAIK - 
>> cgpsmapper/maptk also cannot do it ).
>>
>> On 06.05.2013 17:06, Gerd Petermann wrote:
>>> OK, and thanks for the proposals.
>>>
>>> Gerd
>>>
>>> > Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:01:00 -0400
>>> > From: 

> extremecarver@

>>> > To: 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>>> > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
>>> >
>>> > Just to clarify the naming issue - just like the default I use:
>>> > --mapname=%FID%0000
>>> >
>>> > So subsequent calls for %FID%*.img are also taking the ovm_img files
>>> > into the overview_map/tdb. Calling
>>> > "%FID%????.img doesn't work on cmd.exe (that would be great - so I 
>>> could
>>> > exclude the _ovm.img) AFAIK.
>>> >
>>> > Therefore naming ovm_%FID%.img would be the better option.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Oh and sorry for my mistakes - I'm working over very slow internet
>>> > connection from my laptop. - So it's much harder to implement changes
>>> > compared to working from a nice big monitor and fast internet....
>>> > On 06.05.2013 16:46, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>> > > ups, sorry. Actually it is working as expected - but I missed the
>>> > > options file. I didn't notice that due to the latest style-file
>>> > > reading changes - I had to move the style into a new directory (else
>>> > > additional folders inside the style-file directory would stop 
>>> mkgmap -
>>> > > whereas before it was fine) and on copying the options file was not
>>> > > copied.
>>> > >
>>> > > So it looks like, that with or without additional files, the 
>>> overview
>>> > > map is created correctly... - GREAT.
>>> > >
>>> > > I've got one little problem though - and that is the naming of the
>>> > > ovm.img files. It would be great if they could be called ovm_*.img
>>> > > instead of *_ovm.img - that change would make sure that they are
>>> > > a) not taken into the map as actual map .img files for subsequent
>>> > > mkgmap calls using MapID*.img calls,
>>> > > b) are not included into the NSIS installer
>>> > > On 06.05.2013 16:25, GerdP wrote:
>>> > >> Hi Felix,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> does the last call create the *_ovm.img files ?
>>> > >> If you look at one, does it contain anything 
>>> (points,lines,polygons) ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If not, maybe your style doesn't yet put anything to the low
>>> > >> resolutions?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Gerd
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> > >>> yes thanks I know - but didn't notice I had typed it wrong...
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> As for the input files:
>>> > >>> I use:
>>> > >>> -c template.%countryx% 7*.img
>>> > >>> -- whereas template.%country% contains only the pbf input files 
>>> - and
>>> > >>> 7*.img are precompiled contour files...
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> However I also in a second run, just create the map from the 
>>> created
>>> > >>> *.img files, without contourlines (could change the order too - 
>>> as long
>>> > >>> as the result is right). It would be perfect if I could specify
>>> the
>>> > >>> *_ovm.img for the second run (which is only used for creating an
>>> > >>> additional tdb/overview_map - that doesn't include the 
>>> contourlines).
>>> > >>> The style-file for the 7*.img contourlines is of course 
>>> different. The
>>> > >>> 7*.img being contourlines - only need to be included without 
>>> any map
>>> > >>> information - as the overview map doesn't need contourlines 
>>> (that would
>>> > >>> be next to impossible - except maybe with 1000m equidistance 
>>> anyhow).
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> However - the following call, also returns me an empty basemap 
>>> - even
>>> > >>> though there is only one input (austria splitted):
>>> > >>> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms6000M 
>>> -Xmx10300M
>>> > >>> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1
>>> > >>> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea
>>> > >>> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index
>>> > >>> --adjust-turn-headings --add-pois-to-areas --ignore-maxspeeds
>>> > >>> --reduce-point-density=3 --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6
>>> > >>> --x-housenumbers --remove-short-arcs=5.4 --link-pois-to-ways
>>> > >>> --ignore-turn-restrictions --min-size-polygon=12
>>> > >>> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=1
>>> > >>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest
>>> > >>> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at
>>> > >>> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365
>>> > >>> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_06.05.2013
>>> > >>> --family-name=mtbmap_at_06.05.2013 --tdbfile 
>>> --overview-mapname=mapsetc
>>> > >>> --keep-going --area-name="austria_06.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" -c
>>> > >>> c:\openmtbmap\maps\template.austria
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On 06.05.2013 15:01, GerdP wrote:
>>> > >>>> Hi Felix,
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> it's ant clean, not clear.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> reg. the error message: I have to find a way to handle this. The
>>> > >>>> program
>>> > >>>> wants either all files with an *_ovm.img or none, and all 
>>> *_ovm.img
>>> > >>>> should
>>> > >>>> have the same levels, else this error is triggered.
>>> > >>>> The problem is that the overview builder doesn't know the style
>>> > >>>> that was
>>> > >>>> used to create the *.img files,
>>> > >>>> esp. not if multiple styles were used. So I decided to read 
>>> the levels
>>> > >>>> from
>>> > >>>> the first *_ovm.img file
>>> > >>>> and use it for the overview map. This doesn't work if not all 
>>> files
>>> > >>>> come
>>> > >>>> with a *_ovm.img
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Gerd
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> > >>>>> and the resulting overview map, is completly empty...
>>> > >>>>> could this be related to using besides the OSM as input, also 
>>> adding
>>> > >>>>> contourlines precompiled?
>>> > >>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:39, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>> > >>>>>> ups yes, I had a typo and did ant clear - which doesn#t 
>>> exist in my
>>> > >>>>>> build file -- however I run into the following problem:
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> SEVERE (OverviewMapDataSource): invalid attempt to change 
>>> map levels
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> using the following "options" file:
>>> > >>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:21, 3:20, 4:19, 5:18
>>> > >>>>>> overview-levels = 6:17, 7:16, 8:14
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:10, GerdP wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> did you compile from source? If yes, please try ant clean 
>>> first.
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Gerd
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> > >>>>>>>> for a conservative approach - yes. Though I think adding
>>> > >>>>>>>> resolution
>>> > >>>>>>>> 17
>>> > >>>>>>>> to the overview map, would be quite good (don't know if for
>>> > >>>>>>>> Asia or
>>> > >>>>>>>> Europe continent maps however, the overview map would become
>>> > >>>>>>>> too big
>>> > >>>>>>>> and
>>> > >>>>>>>> fail to compile).
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:53, GerdP wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>> > >>>>>>>>> so you suggest this?
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18
>>> > >>>>>>>>> overview-levels = 4:16, 5:14
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>> > >>>>>>>> BTW - I have a problem with the overview branch - and my
>>> style
>>> > >>>>>>>> (didn't
>>> > >>>>>>>> try default one yet):
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List; 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LinkDestinationHook.init(LinkDestinationHook.java:64) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.pluginChain(OsmMapDataSource.java:182) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.setupHandler(OsmMapDataSource.java:150) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:49) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:124) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:155)
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:57)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:234)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:231)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown
>>> > >>>>>>>> Source)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown
>>> > >>>>>>>> Source)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>>> > >>>>>>>> Source)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>> > >>>>>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List; 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>> 
> <init>
>>> > >>>>>>>> (Locator.java:51)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>> 
> <init>
>>> > >>>>>>>> (Locator.java:47)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>> 
> <init>
>>> > >>>>>>>> (MapBuilder.java:146)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.writeOverviewMap(OverviewBuilder.java:91) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.onFinish(OverviewBuilder.java:84) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:536)
>>> > >>>>>>>> at
>>> > >>>>>>>> 
>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:128) 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:119)
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too!
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I 
>>> have no
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> preference
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> and
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> no experience,
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> so I'd be happy to hear proposals.
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a typo in the options file?
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18"
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used 
>>> in the
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> overview
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought 
>>> overlapping
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> resolutions
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. 
>>> (continent
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> maps).
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the 
>>> overview
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> map
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0-3
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in the normal map)...
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> create
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend 
>>> people to
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> instead?
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> --
>>> > >>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>> > >>>>>>>>> 
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759858.html 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>> > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> --
>>> > >>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>> > >>>>>>> 
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759861.html 
>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>> > >>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> --
>>> > >>>> View this message in context:
>>> > >>>> 
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759868.html 
>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at 
>>> Nabble.com.
>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> > >>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> View this message in context:
>>> > >> 
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759878.html
>>> > >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>> Nabble.com.
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > >> 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>>> > >> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> > 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>>> > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759968.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---

• Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
• Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list