[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?

Tue May 7 15:33:59 BST 2013

great - seems to have all bugs fixed...
Now I can go on to adapt my style to show some more information in lower 
resolutions - because it's not so painfully slow anymore..

I will report back after compiling a map of europe, with suggestion on 
style changes regarding option, line and points file. I think that 
adding forest to resolution 17, and into the overview map, is too much 
to fit in, but let's see....
On 07.05.2013 06:34, GerdP wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've committed r2592 which fixes the issues with the wrong levels and uses
> prefix ovm_ instead of suffix _ovm.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>> 6365????.img is somehow not the same as 6365*.img - even though I
>> deleted all other files beforehand that could match. I don't know
>> whether this is a windows fault, an mkgmap/java fault, or a combination
>> of mkgmap.jar on windows. Even if I use 2587 (so the old overview2
>> branch after merge with trunk, but before new changes) this bug happens,
>> and with ????.img I get Basecamp/Mapsource not opening the map, with
>> *.img they do open the map.
>>
>> Clearly 6365????_ovm.img is therefore incompatible...
>> That's my findings for today...
>>
>>
>> On 06.05.2013 19:15, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>> Here is the second call:
>>> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms4000M -Xmx10400M
>>> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1
>>> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea
>>> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index
>>> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=0
>>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest
>>> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at
>>> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365
>>> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_07.05.2013
>>> --family-name=mtbmap_at_07.05.2013 --tdbfile
>>> --overview-mapname=mapsetx --keep-going
>>> --area-name="austria_07.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" 6365????.img
>>>
>>> The ???? kinda works, but unlike when using 6365*.img, mkgmap doesn't
>>> completly put the content of the ovm_*.img into the overview map.
>>> Seems like only from one tile, the ovm_ is read, and from the other
>>> ones not taken into account. When using 6365*.img, the overviewmap has
>>> the correct complete content, however the addition of the ovm_*.img as
>>> real maptiles crashes Basecamp/Mapsource too. So currently on the
>>> second call - the overview map is not created correctly (besides the
>>> levels problem reported in another strung of this thread).
>>>
>>>
>>> Overall I must say I'm quite impressed. The step to a real overview
>>> map seems nearly finished... (well routable overview map aside, but
>>> besides Garmin no-one managed to produce one so far AFAIK -
>>> cgpsmapper/maptk also cannot do it ).
>>>
>>> On 06.05.2013 17:06, Gerd Petermann wrote:
>>>> OK, and thanks for the proposals.
>>>>
>>>> Gerd
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:01:00 -0400
>>>>> From:
>> extremecarver@
>>>>> To:
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just to clarify the naming issue - just like the default I use:
>>>>> --mapname=%FID%0000
>>>>>
>>>>> So subsequent calls for %FID%*.img are also taking the ovm_img files
>>>>> into the overview_map/tdb. Calling
>>>>> "%FID%????.img doesn't work on cmd.exe (that would be great - so I
>>>> could
>>>>> exclude the _ovm.img) AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore naming ovm_%FID%.img would be the better option.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh and sorry for my mistakes - I'm working over very slow internet
>>>>> connection from my laptop. - So it's much harder to implement changes
>>>>> compared to working from a nice big monitor and fast internet....
>>>>> On 06.05.2013 16:46, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>>>>> ups, sorry. Actually it is working as expected - but I missed the
>>>>>> options file. I didn't notice that due to the latest style-file
>>>>>> reading changes - I had to move the style into a new directory (else
>>>>>> additional folders inside the style-file directory would stop
>>>> mkgmap -
>>>>>> whereas before it was fine) and on copying the options file was not
>>>>>> copied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So it looks like, that with or without additional files, the
>>>> overview
>>>>>> map is created correctly... - GREAT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got one little problem though - and that is the naming of the
>>>>>> ovm.img files. It would be great if they could be called ovm_*.img
>>>>>> instead of *_ovm.img - that change would make sure that they are
>>>>>> a) not taken into the map as actual map .img files for subsequent
>>>>>> mkgmap calls using MapID*.img calls,
>>>>>> b) are not included into the NSIS installer
>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 16:25, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> does the last call create the *_ovm.img files ?
>>>>>>> If you look at one, does it contain anything
>>>> (points,lines,polygons) ?
>>>>>>> If not, maybe your style doesn't yet put anything to the low
>>>>>>> resolutions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>> yes thanks I know - but didn't notice I had typed it wrong...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for the input files:
>>>>>>>> I use:
>>>>>>>> -c template.%countryx% 7*.img
>>>>>>>> -- whereas template.%country% contains only the pbf input files
>>>> - and
>>>>>>>> 7*.img are precompiled contour files...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However I also in a second run, just create the map from the
>>>> created
>>>>>>>> *.img files, without contourlines (could change the order too -
>>>> as long
>>>>>>>> as the result is right). It would be perfect if I could specify
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> *_ovm.img for the second run (which is only used for creating an
>>>>>>>> additional tdb/overview_map - that doesn't include the
>>>> contourlines).
>>>>>>>> The style-file for the 7*.img contourlines is of course
>>>> different. The
>>>>>>>> 7*.img being contourlines - only need to be included without
>>>> any map
>>>>>>>> information - as the overview map doesn't need contourlines
>>>> (that would
>>>>>>>> be next to impossible - except maybe with 1000m equidistance
>>>> anyhow).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However - the following call, also returns me an empty basemap
>>>> - even
>>>>>>>> though there is only one input (austria splitted):
>>>>>>>> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms6000M
>>>> -Xmx10300M
>>>>>>>> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1
>>>>>>>> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea
>>>>>>>> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index
>>>>>>>> --adjust-turn-headings --add-pois-to-areas --ignore-maxspeeds
>>>>>>>> --reduce-point-density=3 --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6
>>>>>>>> --x-housenumbers --remove-short-arcs=5.4 --link-pois-to-ways
>>>>>>>> --ignore-turn-restrictions --min-size-polygon=12
>>>>>>>> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=1
>>>>>>>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest
>>>>>>>> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at
>>>>>>>> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365
>>>>>>>> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_06.05.2013
>>>>>>>> --family-name=mtbmap_at_06.05.2013 --tdbfile
>>>> --overview-mapname=mapsetc
>>>>>>>> --keep-going --area-name="austria_06.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" -c
>>>>>>>> c:\openmtbmap\maps\template.austria
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 15:01, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it's ant clean, not clear.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> reg. the error message: I have to find a way to handle this. The
>>>>>>>>> program
>>>>>>>>> wants either all files with an *_ovm.img or none, and all
>>>> *_ovm.img
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> have the same levels, else this error is triggered.
>>>>>>>>> The problem is that the overview builder doesn't know the style
>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>> used to create the *.img files,
>>>>>>>>> esp. not if multiple styles were used. So I decided to read
>>>> the levels
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> the first *_ovm.img file
>>>>>>>>> and use it for the overview map. This doesn't work if not all
>>>> files
>>>>>>>>> come
>>>>>>>>> with a *_ovm.img
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>>> and the resulting overview map, is completly empty...
>>>>>>>>>> could this be related to using besides the OSM as input, also
>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>> contourlines precompiled?
>>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:39, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> ups yes, I had a typo and did ant clear - which doesn#t
>>>> exist in my
>>>>>>>>>>> build file -- however I run into the following problem:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SEVERE (OverviewMapDataSource): invalid attempt to change
>>>> map levels
>>>>>>>>>>> using the following "options" file:
>>>>>>>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:21, 3:20, 4:19, 5:18
>>>>>>>>>>> overview-levels = 6:17, 7:16, 8:14
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:10, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> did you compile from source? If yes, please try ant clean
>>>> first.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a conservative approach - yes. Though I think adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the overview map, would be quite good (don't know if for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Asia or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Europe continent maps however, the overview map would become
>>>>>>>>>>>>> too big
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail to compile).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:53, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so you suggest this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overview-levels = 4:16, 5:14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW - I have a problem with the overview branch - and my
>>>> style
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try default one yet):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LinkDestinationHook.init(LinkDestinationHook.java:64)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.pluginChain(OsmMapDataSource.java:182)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.setupHandler(OsmMapDataSource.java:150)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:49)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:124)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:155)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:57)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:234)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:231)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> <init>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Locator.java:51)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> <init>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Locator.java:47)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> <init>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (MapBuilder.java:146)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.writeOverviewMap(OverviewBuilder.java:91)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.onFinish(OverviewBuilder.java:84)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:536)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:128)
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:119)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I
>>>> have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no experience,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I'd be happy to hear proposals.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a typo in the options file?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used
>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overview
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought
>>>> overlapping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolutions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value.
>>>> (continent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maps).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the
>>>> overview
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> map
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0-3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the normal map)...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend
>>>> people to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759858.html
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759861.html
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759868.html
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>
>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759878.html
>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759968.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev