[mkgmap-dev] Access flag question

Sun Jan 19 10:18:51 GMT 2014

Hi Chris,

I think the idea of the change was that the java code should not interpret the meaning of osm
tags like private. So, the style author has to decide what that means to him
and set the mkgmap:xxx values accordingly.

Gerd

> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> From: chris66nrw at gmx.de
> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 11:13:31 +0100
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Access flag question
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question to the section in the doc of the new style
> system:
> 
> ---
> Access restrictions of roads are now defined by setting special mkgmap:*
> access tags (mkgmap:car, mkgmap:foot, mkgmap:bicycle, mkgmap:truck,
> mkgmap:bus, mkgmap:taxi, mkgmap:emergency, mkgmap:delivery). Roads are
> blocked for a specific vehicle type if the mkgmap:<type> is set to the
> value no. The new addaccess and setaccess actions help to assign all
> values at once.
> ---
> 
> Are other values than "no" being recognized?
> 
> What about "private" and "destination"?
> 
> Greetings
> Chris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140119/503c31ae/attachment.html>