[mkgmap-dev] Access flag question
From chris66 chris66nrw at gmx.de on Sun Jan 19 10:50:31 GMT 2014
Am 19.01.2014 11:18, schrieb Gerd Petermann: > I think the idea of the change was that the java code should not > interpret the meaning of osm > tags like private. So, the style author has to decide what that means to him > and set the mkgmap:xxx values accordingly. So, "destination" has to be mapped to "no"? But in this case a footway would (in the img file) have the same flags as a destination road. (car=no) Just want to make sure that this case: <http://up.picr.de/17095866ev.jpg> is handeled correctly. >> Are other values than "no" being recognized? >> >> What about "private" and "destination"? Chris
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Access flag question
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Access flag question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list